Note that the date is incorrect, an estimate by staff who were not on the initial recipient list, so it is currently listed as being received on the 20th although it was sent on the 16th (already a bit later than intended due to the vagaries of travel connectivity).

David

On 5 Feb 2015, at 1:30 am, David Cake <dave@difference.com.au> wrote:

The board did not initially understand that it should be treated as correspondence. They do now, and it should appear on the board correspondence page soon.
My understanding is that the board have definitely seen the letter, but do not yet have a response.

Regards

David

On 3 Feb 2015, at 7:30 pm, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org> wrote:

Hi,

We have not yet seen the letter posted.

Do we have any reaction from the Board yet on the issue?

avri

_______________________________________________
Gnso-ncph-leadership mailing list
Gnso-ncph-leadership@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ncph-leadership