What is the adobe connect URL for this meeting? Legal Counsel Telephone: (+1)877-707-5752 100 SE 3rd Avenue, #1310 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 E-Mail: jonathan@nic.club <mailto:jonathan@nic.club> Website: www.nic.club <https://app.getsignals.com/link?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nic.club&ukey=agxzfnNp Z25hbHNjcnhyGAsSC1VzZXJQcm9maWxlGICAgMCxgJ8KDA&k=45d017f459604339b2a27a1009c 040dc> <https://app.getsignals.com/link?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nic.club%2f&ukey=agxzf nNpZ25hbHNjcnhyGAsSC1VzZXJQcm9maWxlGICAgMCxgJ8KDA&k=00a65763b45344369d292997 60b3ae45> Please be advised that this communication is confidential. The information contained in this e-mail, and any attachments, may also be attorney-client privileged and/or work product confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify Jonathan Frost by telephone at 877.707.5752 or by email at jonathan@nic.club <mailto:jonathan@nic.club> and delete the original message. From: gnso-newgtld-dg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-dg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Chan Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 2:11 PM To: gnso-newgtld-dg@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-dg] - Proposed Agenda for 16 March 2015 at 15:00 UTC Dear DG Members, Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures - Monday 16 March 2015 at 15:00 UTC 1. Roll Call / Updates to SOIs 2. Discussion of circulated materials * ICANN Board Resolution - Annex A * GDD Staff Input * Updates to Executive Summary * Updates to Recommendations / Issues matrix 3. Next Steps 4. Confirm next meeting Best, Steven Chan Sr. Policy Manager ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org <mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> direct: +1.310.301.3886 mobile: +1.310.339.4410 tel: +1.310.301.5800 fax: +1.310.823.8649

Steve, further to the call today for good order allow me to repeat the comment I made. 1. Edit to the issues Matrix - tab 2 - Potential New Policy Work Topic 3 Should different application tracks for different TLD types (e.g., closed, open, community restricted, brand, single registrant/registry, closed generic, etc.) be considered? Notable issues DELETE Should limits on the number of applications by one applicant/group be considered? Should the application fee amounts be made variable based on the application track or other variable mechanism? Should fees be reduced for identical applications? 2. Create new Topic Should limits on the number of applications by one applicant/group be considered? Create new notable issues Are there issues of fairness or other to be considered? How would limits be equitably applied? 3. Create new topic Variable fees Notable issues Should the application fee amounts be made variable based on the application track or other variable mechanism? Should fees be reduced for identical applications? ------------------------ Also on formatting It would help for readability to have column 1 in tab 2 (High level topic) formatted as: Text alignment vertical Top. Many thanks Philip Sheppard