Hi Michael,

Could you kindly share the Objections you are referring to? There are no good reports that I know of summarizing the multiple objections, and I am hoping no one expects us all, individually, to cull through the many decisions. :-)

If you could point us in the right direction, I would appreciate it. Also, it would be interesting to know on what grounds the decisions were -- namely, standing, nexus to the string, harm, etc.

Much appreciated,

Kathy

p.s. I would be happy to speak to the Amazon .MOBILE case as I lived and breathed that one.


On 10/3/2017 6:12 AM, Michael Flemming wrote:
Dear All,

Please note that the agenda for this week's call is as below.

  1. Welcome

  2. SOI Updates

  3. Closed Generic Discussion

  4. AOB
Please note that this week will be a continuation of our discussion from last week on Closed Generics. In addition to the NGPC decision, there were several objections filed based against closed generics from the 2012 round. One of these, .mobile, was mentioned on the last couple of calls. Turns out there was more than one decision on this issue, but with opposite results. The assignment is to see if we can extract common themes in the findings to create a path forward that may allow certain closed generics to proceed while addressing the potential harms.

I look forward to discussing with everyone.

Kind regards,

Michael Flemming



_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt2 mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt2@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt2