Frankly, most people aren’t expressing opinions at this time on the list or on the call.   I am very surprised as I think the role of a Co-Chair (and the Sub Pro Chairs) is to facilitate discussion.  I don’t see that happening here.  The environment from you and from Jeff is hostile. 

 

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office

520.879.4725 fax

AAikman@lrrc.com

_____________________________

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 700

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

lrrc.com

 

From: Rubens Kuhl [mailto:rubensk@nic.br]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 4:28 PM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4] Registry Services straw-person

 

 

On Aug 31, 2017, at 8:22 PM, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com> wrote:

 

Rubens,

I don’ t have an objection to establishing 2 tracks – one for established services evaluation and one for new proposed services evaluation.

 

You don't, but most people do, as both the call and the mailing list discussion have shown. 



 

I do object to charging more for an application that proposes new services – it’s against the goal of innovation and creativity.

 

Something that can be raised for applicant support. It's a worthy cause, and lots of jurisdiction give tax breaks to R&D, innovation, entrepreneurship ... it's just out of scope for WT4. 



 I do object to dealing with proposals for new services in the contracting phase.  It is not transparent to the community.

 

 

Not including the community in registry services reviews is how current GNSO policy is. This WG is not chartered to review it. 

 

 

Rubens

 



This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.