Cheryl and Jeff,

 

Rubens says there will be no changes to the slides even though I was asked during the call to suggest language and even though the understanding was changes would be made to the slides since the items were noted as “consensus re”.

 

I must strongly object to Rubens’ refusal to revise the slides in accordance with the transcript from the call, including Kurt Pritz’ very vocal support for one of the changes and no objections from others to the other requested changes.

 

As written, the slides are not reflective of the last call.   If Rubens refuses to revise the slides, then please ask staff to do so based on the language that was typed into chat and agreed in the recording.

 

Thank you,

Anne

 

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office

520.879.4725 fax

AAikman@lrrc.com

_____________________________

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 700

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

lrrc.com

 

From: Rubens Kuhl [mailto:rubensk@nic.br]
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2017 5:33 PM
To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Cc: Cheryl Langdon-Orr; gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4] Registry Services straw-person
Importance: High

 

 



On 12 Dec 2017, at 20:31, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com> wrote:

 

Cheryl and Rubens,

There were consistent references to “rough consensus” in the discussion during this meeting.  

 

 

As was mentioned right when the meeting started, it wasn't a meeting to decide anything, so no any mention was a reference to previous meetings when decisions were made. 



  In addition, there were several changes to the slides which were recommended and agreed.  These changes do not appear in the slides at this time.

 

 



When may we expect them?

 

We won't rewrite history and pretend something different than actually presented had happened. It was a recap, so anything that might require change has to be decided during meetings that actually decide any of the topics where you can suggest changes to actual decisions. 

 

 

Rubens

 

 

 

 



This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.