On 12 Dec 2017, at 20:31, Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com> wrote:

Cheryl and Rubens,
There were consistent references to “rough consensus” in the discussion during this meeting.  


As was mentioned right when the meeting started, it wasn't a meeting to decide anything, so no any mention was a reference to previous meetings when decisions were made. 

  In addition, there were several changes to the slides which were recommended and agreed.  These changes do not appear in the slides at this time.
 


When may we expect them?

We won't rewrite history and pretend something different than actually presented had happened. It was a recap, so anything that might require change has to be decided during meetings that actually decide any of the topics where you can suggest changes to actual decisions. 


Rubens