- Data Request Response: Name Collision Reports Information
Dear WT4 Members, If you’ll recall, WT4 requested additional information for reports of name collisions. Below, please see the requested data elements. Date of report to ICANN Type of TLD where the collision occurred (Single-registrant, Brand, Geo, IDN, Open/Generic, Open/Niche) When and how reporting person detected the collision Affected system (Corporate network, Mobile Application, Web Application, Other-Specify) Registry response (If available) Outcome (to the best of ICANN's knowledge) Attached, please find ICANN Org’s response (and available near the bottom of the Wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/Yz2AAw). Best, Steve Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/
Steve, Thanks and please express our gratitude to those who worked to provide this information. Could we have a follow-up question on the data: - In the cases listed as "Registry not contacted" was that due to ICANN's decision that such a contact was not warranted, or was it due to reporter request for non-disclosure ? WT4 Members, Since this information came too close to our next call, WT4 leadership decided to not include this item in its forthcoming agenda that will only include Registry Services, so people can analyse the info on name collisions in more detail. Rubens
On Sep 26, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote:
Dear WT4 Members,
If you’ll recall, WT4 requested additional information for reports of name collisions. Below, please see the requested data elements.
Date of report to ICANN Type of TLD where the collision occurred (Single-registrant, Brand, Geo, IDN, Open/Generic, Open/Niche) When and how reporting person detected the collision Affected system (Corporate network, Mobile Application, Web Application, Other-Specify) Registry response (If available) Outcome (to the best of ICANN's knowledge)
Attached, please find ICANN Org’s response (and available near the bottom of the Wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/Yz2AAw <https://community.icann.org/x/Yz2AAw>).
Best, Steve
Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support
ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org <mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <applewebdata://310CAD3E-E244-4690-A938-C2655DD44BDE/learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>.
Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO <https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO> Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ <https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/> http://gnso.icann.org/en/ <http://gnso.icann.org/en/>
<Name collision report summary - 2017-09-26.xlsx>_______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4>
Rubens, I will pass along your thanks as well as the follow-up question. Best, Steve From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 5:36 PM To: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4] - Data Request Response: Name Collision Reports Information Steve, Thanks and please express our gratitude to those who worked to provide this information. Could we have a follow-up question on the data: - In the cases listed as "Registry not contacted" was that due to ICANN's decision that such a contact was not warranted, or was it due to reporter request for non-disclosure ? WT4 Members, Since this information came too close to our next call, WT4 leadership decided to not include this item in its forthcoming agenda that will only include Registry Services, so people can analyse the info on name collisions in more detail. Rubens On Sep 26, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote: Dear WT4 Members, If you’ll recall, WT4 requested additional information for reports of name collisions. Below, please see the requested data elements. Date of report to ICANN Type of TLD where the collision occurred (Single-registrant, Brand, Geo, IDN, Open/Generic, Open/Niche) When and how reporting person detected the collision Affected system (Corporate network, Mobile Application, Web Application, Other-Specify) Registry response (If available) Outcome (to the best of ICANN's knowledge) Attached, please find ICANN Org’s response (and available near the bottom of the Wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/Yz2AAw). Best, Steve Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/ <Name collision report summary - 2017-09-26.xlsx>_______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4
Dear Rubens, WT4 Members, In response to Rubens’ inquiry: In the cases listed as "Registry not contacted" was that due to ICANN's decision that such a contact was not warranted, or was it due to reporter request for non-disclosure? Please find the following response from GDD Technical Services: "The reason is either: 1) the ICANN organization determined that contacting the registry was not necessary given that the reporter was able to fix the issue(s) in their network relatively quickly; or 2) the reporter did not respond when asked if they approved ICANN to put them in contact with the registry." Best, Steve From: <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 6:00 PM To: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4] [Ext] Re: - Data Request Response: Name Collision Reports Information Rubens, I will pass along your thanks as well as the follow-up question. Best, Steve From: Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at 5:36 PM To: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4] - Data Request Response: Name Collision Reports Information Steve, Thanks and please express our gratitude to those who worked to provide this information. Could we have a follow-up question on the data: - In the cases listed as "Registry not contacted" was that due to ICANN's decision that such a contact was not warranted, or was it due to reporter request for non-disclosure ? WT4 Members, Since this information came too close to our next call, WT4 leadership decided to not include this item in its forthcoming agenda that will only include Registry Services, so people can analyse the info on name collisions in more detail. Rubens On Sep 26, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote: Dear WT4 Members, If you’ll recall, WT4 requested additional information for reports of name collisions. Below, please see the requested data elements. Date of report to ICANN Type of TLD where the collision occurred (Single-registrant, Brand, Geo, IDN, Open/Generic, Open/Niche) When and how reporting person detected the collision Affected system (Corporate network, Mobile Application, Web Application, Other-Specify) Registry response (If available) Outcome (to the best of ICANN's knowledge) Attached, please find ICANN Org’s response (and available near the bottom of the Wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/Yz2AAw). Best, Steve Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/ <Name collision report summary - 2017-09-26.xlsx>_______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4
Attached is a spreadsheet based on the data provided. After eliminating 4 instances with no information, there were 34 occurrences. Some takeaways: - 18 unique TLDs represented in the 34 occurrences - A median of 3 occurrences per TLD (that's to say that nearly half of them had 1 to 3 occurrences, the other half 4 to 7 occurrences) - A median of 22 days between the delegation and the report, with some very late reporting (maximum was 568 days) - 7 brand/exclusive-use TLDs, 1 GeoTLD/Governmental registry among the 18 TLDs - 23 cases reported as service disruption, 9 as networking errors - 21 cases affected company networks, 7 a single local computer, 2 application development environments, 1 web application - In 24 cases the registry was not contacted, in 5 the registry was put in contact with the reporter, in 1 registry stopped controlled interruption, in 1 no action was taken - All 5 known outcomes that were reported were that the network was updated, all others are unknown </co-chair> What was already known: - No human-life threatening collisions - Very low number of reported occurrences What I expected and was confirmed: - No IDN TLD collisions reported - Brand TLDs having a share of the occurrences - Little data on outcomes (people usually don't go back to tell their history after problem is fixed) - Very few (1) instances where interruption was interrupted What was unexpected to me: - Very few (1) occurrences with GeoTLDs. It was forecasted that since many multi-site and global organisations built network hierarchies with city names and airport codes, those would have a higher incidence of collisions. Even some suspected cases like .cba, a brand, was supposed to generate collisions with geographic identifiers used in Chiba (JP), Córdoba (AR) and Cuiabá (BR). - Late reporting. Considering most people wouldn't wait almost 2 years to troubleshoot a problem, that indicates that some other conditions had to change for the collision to occur: actual registration of a colliding domain, network reconfiguration that allowed it to happen etc. - Reduced number of attempts to include registry into the incident response Rubens
On Sep 26, 2017, at 8:30 PM, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote:
Dear WT4 Members,
If you’ll recall, WT4 requested additional information for reports of name collisions. Below, please see the requested data elements.
Date of report to ICANN Type of TLD where the collision occurred (Single-registrant, Brand, Geo, IDN, Open/Generic, Open/Niche) When and how reporting person detected the collision Affected system (Corporate network, Mobile Application, Web Application, Other-Specify) Registry response (If available) Outcome (to the best of ICANN's knowledge)
Attached, please find ICANN Org’s response (and available near the bottom of the Wiki page here: https://community.icann.org/x/Yz2AAw <https://community.icann.org/x/Yz2AAw>).
Best, Steve
Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support
ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 steve.chan@icann.org <mailto:steve.chan@icann.org> mobile: +1.310.339.4410 office tel: +1.310.301.5800 office fax: +1.310.823.8649
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <applewebdata://310CAD3E-E244-4690-A938-C2655DD44BDE/learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...>.
Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO <https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO> Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ <https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/> http://gnso.icann.org/en/ <http://gnso.icann.org/en/>
<Name collision report summary - 2017-09-26.xlsx>_______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org <mailto:Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4@icann.org> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4 <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt4>
participants (2)
-
Rubens Kuhl -
Steve Chan