Hi All,

 

I didn’t think we were going to just remove “Treatment of these strings was inconsistent.”, which some thought was a value judgment, but rather modify it to something like “Some believe that treatment of these strings was inconsistent.”  I think this is consistent with the “Some” approach that is throughout the document.

 

Best,

Paul

 

 

 

From: Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Annebeth Lange
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 1:52 AM
To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org>
Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] [Ext] AW: Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC

 

Hi all

 

I have no strong objections to this. Actually, it is important to highlight it when it is only «some», so it does not seem like it is a view the whole group shares.

 

Best regards,

Annebeth

 

 

Annebeth B Lange

Special Adviser International Policy

UNINETT Norid AS

Phone: +47 959 11 559

Mail: annebeth.lange@norid.no

 

 


29. nov. 2018 kl. 22:00 skrev Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org>:

Dear all,

 

It appears that we neglected to walk through these new comments from Jorge on the call yesterday. If there are any strong objections to the following, please respond on list by 21:00 UTC tomorrow, 30 November:

 

  • On page 12, remove sentence “Treatment of these strings was inconsistent.”
  • On page 42, add the word “some” to the sentence referenced below.

 

Kind regards,

Emily

 

From: "Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch" <Jorge.Cancio@bakom.admin.ch>
Date: Wednesday, 28 November 2018 at 11:42
To: Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org>, "gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] AW: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC

 

Dear Emily

 

Please include the following comments in the consideration:

 

-        Page 12: “Treatment of these strings was inconsistent.” à this is just the opinion expressed (as far as I know) by one member. “inconsistent” is a value call. We could say that there were different treatments – whether that differentiation was inconsistent or not has not been agreed.

 

-        Page 42: the following heading/intro seems to reflect an agreed view, when it is only the view of “some”, hence it should read “Some of the issues problems and negative experiences that some Work Track members identified from the 2012 round include the following.”

 

Best regards

 

Jorge

 

Von: Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 <gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces@icann.org> Im Auftrag von Emily Barabas
Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. November 2018 20:52
An: gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org
Betreff: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Proposed Agenda - Work Track 5 - 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC

 

Dear all,

 

Please find below the proposed agenda for the Work Track 5 call taking place tomorrow 28 November 2018 at 20:00 UTC for 90 mins.

 

  1. Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
  2. Initial Report – Outstanding Items
  3. AOB

-        Additional information request – Geographic Names Panel

 

Please find attached the latest version of the draft Initial Report. This version incorporates new feedback received in the last week. New comments are highlighted in either blue or yellow. For those highlighted in blue, the resolution was relatively straightforward and staff has proposed edits. Comments in yellow require additional input and will be discussed on the call tomorrow.

 

Kind regards,

Emily

 

Emily Barabas | Policy Manager

ICANN | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

Email: emily.barabas@icann.org | Phone: +31 (0)6 84507976

 

_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5


The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. If this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author. Any tax advice contained in this email was not intended to be used, and cannot be used, by you (or any other taxpayer) to avoid penalties under applicable tax laws and regulations.