Agree with Peter.

Best regards,

Katrin

DOTZON GmbH - digital identities for tomorrow
Akazienstrasse 28
10823 Berlin
Deutschland - Germany
Tel: +49 30 49802722
Fax: +49 30 49802727
Mobile: +49 173 2019240
ohlmer@dotzon.consulting
www.dotzon.consulting

DOTZON GmbH
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg, HRB 118598
Geschäftsführer: Katrin Ohlmer
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Akazienstrasse 28, 10823 Berlin

Von: Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5-bounces@icann.org] Im Auftrag von Peter Van Roste
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Januar 2018 17:19
An: Icann Gnso Newgtld Wg Wt5 <Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org>
Betreff: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5] Conclusion of CWG-UCTN on 2-character codes

Not responding to anyone in particular, but a suggestion to all:

We are still trying to agree on what ‘geographic terms’ are.

As mentioned in the chat yesterday, I believe this is part of the scoping of the exercise and will help us later on to determine on which names we want to suggest policy. Discussing strings that are unlikely to be ever considered geographic names is a bit pointless.

Engaging at this stage in a policy discussion seems premature (even though it is undoubtedly more interesting).

The descriptions as used in the 2012 AGB (see Martin’s email dd 08/01 and as presented on the call yesterday) seem workable to me. Has anyone come up with a name that s/he considers to be a geographic name that does not fit?

Kind Regards,

Peter