Dear Martin Sutton, Dear WT5 Co-Leads:
Thank you for this update, with a view to the next WT5 meeting on Wednesday 4 April (14.00 UTC).
May I say that, for many participants, in view of the Easter long weekend, this is extremely short notice
I have several comments and suggestions:
ISO-3166: Allow me to recall that WT5 has already spent more time than necessary to achieve 'status quo' with regard to the 2012 AGB.
Regarding long and short form ISO 3166 names, I have seen nothing recently in WT5 or on the List that would treat these differently from the 3-character codes. It would not be appropriate to 'defer broader questions…' about these. After all, that is what WT5 is here for.
WT5 has yet to begin addressing the outstanding issues, including:
- terms and conditions for the delegation of the generality of geographical names; including a wide range of sub-national and regional terms that are not addressed by ISO 3166.
- protection of individual users' interests in the transparency and predictability of geographical names relating to their locations, communities and economies.
- the overlap – in the past - between a few geographical names and some brands;
- the treatment of IDN geographical names, including three character expressions.
N.B. The CCWG-UNCT Final Paper, June 2017, has nothing in it that is useful in these respects.
Time Line: I would question the wisdom of deferring until May 2012 discussion of 'terms not included in the 2012 AGB'. Since WT5 has already taken several months to reach a qualified consensus on ISO 3166, I wonder what can be achieved in the next few weeks regarding all the remaining issues, for which discussion has yet to begin.
I would request that the agenda of the next conference calls be adapted to address in priority the terms not included in the AGB.
Regards to you all,
Christopher Wilkinson

_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5 mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg-wt5