Dear Work Track 5 members, Please see below the action items and notes from the Work Track 5 meeting today, 03 April 2019 at 20:00 UTC. These high-level notes are designed to help WT5 members navigate through the content of the call and are not a substitute for the recording, transcript, or the chat, which will be posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/2019-04-03+New+gTLD+Subsequent+Pro.... Kind regards, Julie Julie Hedlund, Policy Director Notes and Action Items: 1. SOI Updates: No updates provided. 2. Continue Review of Public Comments: Questions for Community Input – start at line 55, #e4 Question e4: Summary: Lines 56-68, Supports all Principles (though qualfied for some) Lines 56-61, Business Constituency, RDS-HN (Honduras), Dotzon GmbH, Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG), dotBERLIN GmbH & Co. KG,, Hamburg Top-Level-Domain GmbH,, geoTLD.group -- Agreement - Supports all Principles Line 62, International Trademark Association (INTA) -- Agreement (qualified) -- Supports all Principles Line 63, NCSG -- Agreement New Idea -- Supports all Principles Line 64, IPC -- Agreement (but with qualifications) Concerns -- Supports all Principles Line 65, RySG, Agreement Concerns -- Supports all Principles Line 66, United States, Agreement Concerns -- Supports all Principles Line 67, "Group of Registries: Uniregistry Minds + Machines Group Top Level Design Amazon Registry Services , Employ Media LLC" -- Agreement Concerns -- Supports all Principles Line 68, CENTR AFNIC -- Agreement (with bullet 1, to some extent) Concerns Line 69, ALAC -- Agreement Concerns -- Supports 2, 3, 4 Line 70, ccNSO -- Agreement (with bullet 1, to some extent) Concerns -- Supports 1 Line 71, Portuguese Government -- [comment] -- Believes principles should be aligned with GAC principles Line 72, Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia, Fundación Incluirme -- [Does not comment on identified principles, refers back to GAC documentation] -- Line 73, Tom Dale (Individual) -- [Comment - questions posed to the WG] Line 74, Government of Spain, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property, SWITCH, Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs, German GAC, oriGIn, European Broadcasting Union, government of France, association of European regions for origin products (AREPO), Republic of Peru -- [Does not seem to directly relate to question. However, one could infer that the commenter supports at least 2 and 3] Question e5: Line 76, Government of Spain, Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property, SWITCH, Icelandic Ministry for Foreign Affairs, German GAC, oriGIn, European Broadcasting Union, government of France, association of European regions for origin products (AREPO), Republic of Peru -- Summary: Basis should be: -- international law -- national law -- local law -- relevant public policy input from GAC and governments Line 77, Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia, Fundación Incluirme -- [comment] Same points as Line 76. Line 78, Portuguese Government -- [comment]. Same points as Line 76. Line 79, Government of Brazil -- Same points as Line 76. Line 80, ALAC -- [comments] -- Basis should be: -- international law -- national law -- local law -- norms and values and immemorial usage (i.e. usage of a name extends beyond the reach of memory) Line 81, IPC -- Concerns -- Basis should be: -- international law -- national law (qualified) -- local law (qualified) -- policy (qualified) Line 82, INTA -- Concerns -- Basis should be: -- international law -- national law (qualified) -- local law (qualified) Line 83, dotBERLIN GmbH & Co. KG, Hamburg Top-Level-Domain GmbH, geoTLD.group -- Basis should be: -- international law -- national law -- local law Line 84, Dotzon GmbH -- Basis should be: -- international law -- national law -- local law Line 85, RySG -- Concerns -- Basis should be: -- international law -- Some support for national law -- Some support for local law Line 86, Business Constituency -- [comments] Basis should be: -- international law -- national law -- multinational treaties Line 87, United States -- [comment] -- Basis should be: -- international law -- national law (qualified) Line 88, Brand Registry Group -- [concerns] Basis should be: -- international law Line 89, Group of Registries: Uniregistry, Minds + Machines Group , Top Level Design , Amazon Registry Services, Employ Media LLC -- [comment] -- Basis should be: international law