Hi All,

Could anybody translate this one for me:

The PDP WG notes that “the purpose of an application fee floor is to deter speculation

and potential warehousing of TLDs, as well as mitigate against the use of TLDs for

abusive or malicious purposes.” ICANN org seeks input on whether this provision could

be harmonized with the "bona fide" applicant provision from the Auction section, as the

fee schedule could be proactive as opposed to a reactive means of deterring speculative

applications

Does this say we should put a focus on a sufficiently high application fee floor – or does it mean that the fee floor is irrelevant as other means would deter speculative applications?

Thanks,

Alexander

From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Karen Lentz
Sent: Donnerstag, 1. Oktober 2020 03:21
To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] FW: ICANN Org SubPro comments

Dear all,

Forwarding for your information the input from ICANN org to the draft Final Report.  We have also submitted this for addition into the comment tool being used for this comment forum.

Best regards,

Karen

From: Theresa Swinehart <theresa.swinehart@icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, September 30, 2020 at 5:10 PM
To: "jeff@jjnsolutions.com" <jeff@jjnsolutions.com>, "langdonorr@gmail.com" <langdonorr@gmail.com>
Cc: Goran Marby <goran.marby@icann.org>, Karen Lentz <karen.lentz@icann.org>, David Olive <david.olive@icann.org>, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>
Subject: ICANN Org SubPro comments

Dear Cheryl and Jeff,

Please find the attached letter and submission from ICANN org regarding the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP Working Group Draft final report.

I hope you and your families are well.

Kind regards,

Theresa