+1

The call was re-scheduled so some people who might have attended on the original time couldn’t at the new time

If there is to be any kind of poll about call times it should be with the entire group

Regards

Michele

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
http://www.blacknight.host/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://ceo.hosting/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845

From: <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Rafik Dammak via Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>
Reply-To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday 23 February 2016 at 00:33
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Cc: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Scheduling Call for 29 February: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG

Hi,

Thanks Julie for sharing this. I would like to highlight that doesn't make sense to poll about next call time only  those who could  attend today in first place.
I hope that we are planning some rotation of confcall times.

Best.

Rafik

On Feb 23, 2016 9:13 AM, "Julie Hedlund via Gnso-newgtld-wg" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Dear New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group (WG) members,

Per the action item on today’s call, staff have reviewed the GNSO schedule and found that there are no conflicts to hold a call on 29 February at 2200 UTC.  Also, after reviewing the chat room transcript there seemed to be support for holding the call at that day and time.  Thus, in the interest of getting the call on everyone’s schedule as quickly as possible, we will proceed to have the GNSO Secretariat schedule the call.

Kind regards,
Julie 

_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg