-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Letter from Steve Crocker to GNSO Council
Chair
From: Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com>
Date: Tue, August 09, 2016 10:45 am
To: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>

Resending as I mistakenly put Volker on this email as opposed to Donna. Sorry for the duplication.

Jeffrey J. Neuman

Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA

1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600

Mclean, VA 22102, United States

E: jeff.neuman@valideus.com or jeff.neuman@comlaude.com

T: +1.703.635.7514

M: +1.202.549.5079

@Jintlaw

From: Jeff Neuman
Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 1:44 PM
To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org
Cc: James Bladel (jbladel@godaddy.com) <jbladel@godaddy.com>; Heather Forrest <Heather.Forrest@acu.edu.au>; Volker Greimann <vgreimann@key-systems.net>
Subject: Letter from Steve Crocker to GNSO Council Chair

All,

I came across this letter in passing and thought it was useful to send to the group as it relates to our work. One of the items I would like to ask each work track to think about is the key question raised here:, namely within the work tracks, “Are there a set of critical issues that can be identified to be addressed prior to a new application process?” Or, is it the view of the Community that the entire PDP must be completed prior to a new process?

I believe the identification of these issues is a critical first step of the work tracks and will help to produce work plans for the respective tracks. I am cc’ing GNSO Council leadership on this email to keep them in the loop.

Best regards,