Phil - The only hint we have to date is that, apparently for security reasons, a rate of about 1000 new TLDs per year would be manageable.

1.  Personally, I find that figure rather high notably because of the lead times required between an application and a final delegation in the Root.  I have asked on the Calls for an indication from the ICANN staff as to how many new applications, per month, they can handle in terms of the economic and technical due diligence that I assume would be required. We have not yet had a response.

2.  I have also proposed that in policy terms the issue should be disaggregated into more manageable batches of categories, since many of the relevant parameters will be distinct. The obvious categories would be Brands, Geographical Names, Geographical Indications and IDNs (by script). There could be other re-groupiings of applications such as undeserved regions and Communities.
Policy would of course determine priorities in time.

These options have not yet been discussed by the Work Tracks concerned.

Regards

Christopher

El 17 de junio de 2018 a las 23:16 Rubens Kuhl <rubensk@nic.br> escribió:

On 17 Jun 2018, at 14:59, Phil Buckingham <phil@dotadvice.co.uk> wrote:

Steve,

 

Thanks for the agenda.

Sorry I won’t be able to make the call. I am at Royal Ascot, watching the horse races with Her Majesty  ! 

 

Would it be possible to send a link to the Executive Summary. Will  this executive summary show the number of anticipated applications and the associated costings , as well as timelines. 

 

I don't think it was ever envisioned for the PDP to have those results, since they are dependent on both policy and program implementation. 

Rubens

_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg