I can talk to this on the call but I have a different issue with the term “last call.”
My understanding is that there is or will be outreach to the SSAC to get clarity around a few items and until we get that, discuss it, and reflect it in the document I don’t think we can close it off. We
may be able to table it until we get the clarity, but it shouldn’t be closed off.
From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org>
On Behalf Of Aikman-Scalese, Anne
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 3:06 PM
To: 'Steve Chan' <steve.chan@icann.org>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 24 September 2018 at 20:00 UTC
Importance: High
Jeff et al,
Regarding the “last call for input on SAC 090 matrix”, I don’t think that document can be finalized until SubGroup B has reviewed public comment. The reason is that there are still issues to
be considered there and the WG should not be finalizing anything for “last call” until public comment on the issues has been reviewed and discussed and then shared with the entire Working Group. At present, the document represents “Interim Status as of the
Initial Report before Public Comment”.
By way of example, there is a change to the language on Recommendation 2 which discusses the SAC Recommendation 2 in relation to Special Use Domain Names. The change adds that the WG is considering
how changes to these names should be “treated during the application window” as well as after delegation. The subject of changes to Special Use Domain Names post-application was not considered or discussed in Work Track 4 as far as I know.
Separately, regarding SAC 90 Recommendation 4, I don’t think the issue is what the PDP WG thinks is meant by the word “complete this work”.
Rather, the PDP WG needs to address the public comments on the Initial Report in order to respond to this Recommendation.
Unfortunately, I was not able to propose the above changes since the document was sent as a pdf which could not be edited.
Thank you,
Anne
|
Anne E. Aikman-Scalese |
|
Of Counsel |
|
520.629.4428 office |
|
520.879.4725 fax |
|
_____________________________ |
|
|
|
Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP |
|
One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000 |
|
Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611 |
From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Steve Chan
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2018 3:57 PM
To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - 24 September 2018 at 20:00 UTC
Dear WG Members,
Please find the proposed agenda for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG meeting scheduled for 24 September 2018 at 20:00
UTC, for 90 minutes.
For agenda items 2 and 3, please find the latest staff draft, which seeks to incorporate input received during past WG meetings.
For item 4, you will also find the latest staff draft, with proposed updates.
Those signed up as Members to this PDP WG should have received meeting information from the SOAC Support team. If you did not receive these participation details or if you would like to send your apologies, please
contact the SOAC Support team (gnso-secs@icann.org).
Best,
Steve
Steven Chan
Policy Director, GNSO Support
ICANN
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Mobile: +1.310.339.4410
Office Telephone: +1.310.301.5800
Office Fax: +1.310.823.8649
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our
interactive courses and visiting the GNSO
Newcomer pages.
Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO
Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message
or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying
to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.