Phil,

The new financial evaluation model for SubPro doesn't include submitting business details, only certification of them. So a new submission is expected, but it will only contain updated certification for the new business details, not the details per se. 

It seems people still think of it using the angle of the 2012 financial evaluation, but this is one area where lot of changes were agreed to by the WG. 


Rubens


On 3 Aug 2020, at 21:25, Phil Buckingham <phil@dotadvice.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Steve, Hi Jeff, 

Steve, thanks for sending out Model 6. Unfortunately I won’t be able to make the call at 04 00 my time later today. 
Here is my take .. there are a lot of ideas and solutions to problems 
A lot need strengthening and clarifying 
Overview 
1 . My personal view is that if there is any form of partnership / JV that results in a financial consolidation of two or more original individual applications then this is deemed material . It WILL require an immediate submission of the full consolidated financial pack for an immediate new financial evaluation by the evaluators.
It would also trigger a new public comment period , a new period to file objections ( due to the material changing circumstances ) . I think we should add that these objections could include any competition , anti trust issues. 

Rebuttable presumptions :
I’m in agreement with Christa re ( g) . 
This whole idea is very confusing and will be very very difficult to prove. 
Agree with Christa on adding another clause . 
IDEA : perhaps we get contention set applicants to submit a Reconciliation Statement of Use of Funds  ( in resolving over 3 contention sets ) , which would have to be submitted to the financial evaluators .