Agree with Cheryl .
From: gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org]
On Behalf Of Cheryl Langdon-Orr via Gnso-newgtld-wg
Sent: Monday, 22 February 2016 4:35 PM
To: Khaled Koubaa <khaled.koubaa@gmail.com>
Cc: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] WG Leadership positions
I would prefer to have Co-Chairs (with all the experience and independent neutrality in actions, that such roles require) and a set of 5 SubTeam Leaders who can then forn part of a Leadership Team... Especially as I assume that the ST leads will be specifically
active, and "qualified" in terms of knowledge and experience with relation to the ST Topics...
On 23 Feb 2016 10:30, "Khaled Koubaa via Gnso-newgtld-wg" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> wrote:
Following up with the discussion we had, I would like to refer our future discussion to the
GNSO Working Group Guidelines.
To be consistent with those guidelines, I tend to prefer that we adopt the following leadership positions :
- A Chair (1) : duties defined in point 2.2.1 of the WG Guidelines
- A Vice-Chair (s) : duties defined in point 2.2.2 of the same guidelines.
The question will be how many Vice-Chair we will elect ?
In the presentation that Steve made tonight, I understood that 38 issues were identified and grouped in 5 groups. I think it will be good to have 5 Vice-Chairs who in the same time can be each one of them the Chair of one Sub-Groups that
will be covering one of those 5 group of issues.
For the record, I would like to support Steven Coates nomination for a Vice-Chair role.
_______________________________________________
Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list
Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg