Thank you, Emily.
Jeff and Cheryl, do we take from this document that all Recommendations are meant to be “MUST” and all Implementation Guidance is meant to be “SHOULD”? (If so, don’t we have some recommendations which state
something the ICANN Board should do (which cannot say MUST) cause neither we nor Council has that level of authority over the Board, which is bound by its own fiduciary duties.
Regarding the “No Agreement” section in the document linked below, could you please give us some examples on the call of the “very few” areas where the WG did not reach agreement? In that definition, are you
getting at the issue of “agreement” or the issue of “consensus”?
Thank you,
Anne
From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org>
On Behalf Of Emily Barabas
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2020 10:42 AM
To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Thursday, 28 May at 20:00 UTC for 90 Minutes
[EXTERNAL]
Dear all,
The Co-Chairs will reference one additional document on today’s call, available here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CYOruGqewTsu5ejL_zoom0ol6VA1xMLX2FXW2VAy4eI/edit?usp=sharing
This short document contains draft definitions of terms that are used in the draft Final Report sections, including Affirmation, Affirmation with modification, Recommendation, Implementation Guidance, and No Agreement. It also discusses
use of the terms “should” and “must.”
Kind regards,
Emily
From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Julie Hedlund
<julie.hedlund@icann.org>
Date: Tuesday, 26 May 2020 at 20:56
To: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG - Thursday, 28 May at 20:00 UTC for 90 Minutes
Dear all,
Please find below the proposed agenda for the call on Thursday, 28 May 2020
at 20:00 UTC for 90
minutes.
Proposed Agenda:
a.
Review "Can't Live With" comments on packages 1-3:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hh8Wj3IwXvi91Am1k4Zoooct2zmPOmVe1pLmjQLuQuo/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
b.
Review Category 1/Verified TLDs in 2.3.2 Registry commitments / Public Interest Commitments:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kUlmZH8nxWTgfcRluA5FxLheMm4XhhOwkRt7om52aQU/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com], page 139; see also the ICANN46 Beijing Communique’ at:
https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann46-beijing-communique [gac.icann.org]
If you need a dial out or would like to submit an apology, please email gnso-secs@icann.org.
Kind regards,
Julie