Jeff and Cheryl (and Paul McGrady),

Jeff, you said that if there were any proposed changes to the GAC Advice language, we should get those in by May 1. 

 

However, the last time the WG looked at this, Paul had inserted a number of redline changes into the document.  So which version are you expecting us to use when you ask for proposals to be made no later than May 1?  And are these alternate proposals supposed to come in the form of redlines to the WG document in the same manner that Paul used?

 

I had understood that Paul was doing some redrafting of his numerous edits.  Or was there another small group that was supposed to be convened on this point?

 

I don’t see any way we can cancel the discussion on the language covering GAC Advice, even though you suggested at the top of the last call that we might.

 

Thank you,

Anne

 

 

Anne E. Aikman-Scalese

Of Counsel

520.629.4428 office

520.879.4725 fax

AAikman@lrrc.com

_____________________________

Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLP

One South Church Avenue, Suite 2000

Tucson, Arizona 85701-1611

lrrc.com

Because what matters

to you, matters to us.™

 



This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.