Dear PDP WG members,

Please see below the discussion notes and action items captured by staff from the meeting on 02 May.  These high-level notes are designed to help PDP WG members navigate through the content of the call and are not meant as a substitute for the transcript.  The MP3, transcript, and chat are provided separately and are posted on the wiki at: https://community.icann.org/display/NGSPP/1.+WG+Meetings. 

Action Item re: Subject Reviews — PDP WG Members should review the Google Docs as follows (and referenced below):

3. Subject 2: Should the subsequent procedures be rounds?  Pros and Cons — See: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p7RqPPNafMOViLyG-y_isLeYkcqsjHLIgLEXTOPKp_s/edit?usp=sharing.
4. Subject 3: Predictability Pros and Cons — See: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qwbdz_iwAHVVpJwm2RPJK5w07QXxjM9QNn0NAyquVT8/edit?usp=sharing.  

Kind regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Policy Director

Discussion Notes/Actions: New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG Meeting, 02 May 2016

1. Review of action items (https://community.icann.org/x/A0WAAw)

Action Items:
1) Geographic distribution/rotation of meetings: Consider rotation for APAC. Staff to review/edit and then share Excel document.
2) Letter to Chairs to collect statements:  Send out a communication and get as many statements as possible.  Include link in the communication on overall issues.  Staff will prepare a draft letter.
3) Staff to send around a note to CC1 volunteers re: next steps

2. Subject discussion: 4.2.7 Applications Assessed in Rounds, continued (Final Issue Report excerpt available on Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/Jz2AAw)

Action Item: PDP WG members should review the Google Doc at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p7RqPPNafMOViLyG-y_isLeYkcqsjHLIgLEXTOPKp_s/edit?usp=sharing.

3. Subject discussion: 4.2.2 Predictability, continued (Final Issue Report excerpt available on Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/HT2AAw) 

Action Item: PDP WG members should review the Google Doc at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Qwbdz_iwAHVVpJwm2RPJK5w07QXxjM9QNn0NAyquVT8/edit?usp=sharing.

Question: Prioritize the pros and cons?  Suggest letting the Drafting Teams that are putting these into questions for the community consider priority.