Dear WG Members,

Please note that the previous version of the compilation of GAC input, shared on 4 May 2020, required a minor update. Previously, the document included draft input from the United States. However the attached updated version integrates the final version of input from the United States, which is the only difference between the two documents.

Please let us know if there are any questions.

Best,

Steve

From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org>
Date: Monday, May 4, 2020 at 3:22 AM
To: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] FW: [Ext] Compilation of GAC input on Draft Recommendations of GNSO SubPro PDP WG on future New gTLDs

Please see below.

From: Manal Ismail <manal@tra.gov.eg>
Date: Monday, 4 May 2020 at 12:06
To: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@gmail.com>, Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com>
Cc: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>, Emily Barabas <emily.barabas@icann.org>, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@icann.org>, "GACSTAFF (gac-staff@icann.org) (gac-staff@icann.org)" <gac-staff@icann.org>
Subject: [Ext] Compilation of GAC input on Draft Recommendations of GNSO SubPro PDP WG on future New gTLDs

[cc’ing GNSO support staff to kindly forward to the SubPro PDP WG mailing list]

Dear Cheryl and Jeff,

I hope this email finds you well. As noted during ICANN67, following the focus on priority topics to the GAC on Subsequent Rounds of new gTLDs being discussed within the SubPro PDP WG, GAC members were asked to provide input on PDP WG draft recommendations available to date (attached – as of March 27^th 2020) and answered three specific questions on each of the following topics:

      1.  GAC Advice and GAC Early Warnings

      2.  Public Commitments (PICs)

      3.  Applicant Support Program

      4.  Community Applications

      5.  Closed Generics

Please note this input is not GAC consensus advice as specified in the compilation document but individual input from GAC Members and Observers on current draft final recommendations.

For your reference, please find attached:

• The compilation document with input received from 23 GAC members and observers on the five topics mentioned above, via three specific questions on each topic;
• The GAC written consultation document originally submitted to GAC members for your reference, which includes:

o Prior GAC positions;

o Draft final recommendations from the SubPro PDP;

o Questions to GAC members on each topic

The GAC welcomes any further engagement with SubPro PDP WG Leadership on the input provided, and on ongoing recommendations being drafted.

Many thanks for your continuous cooperation and engagement with the GAC.

Kind Regards,

--Manal