Vanda,
I think this is a very good idea, whereby perhaps each of the Leadership team ( Chairs- Jeff & Avri) & ( Co- Chairs -Work Tracks 1,2,3,4) acts /is assigned as a direct liaison with/in/ for/ a particular stakeholder group. Would certainly avoid duplication of effort.
I will raise this at our next leadership meeting.
Thanks,
Phil
Phil Buckingham.
Co- Chair, WT2, Legal and Regulatory.
From: gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Vanda Scartezini
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 1:47 PM
To: Jeff Neuman; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Fwd: Letter from the RySG's RSP Discussion Group
Thank you jeff. Some groups from this discussion group will certainly be aligned with for instance, our track 1. May be the best way to go forward with this alignment is to have “liaisons” working in both groups to guarantee real exchange of ideas and avoid duplication of effort.
Best to all
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004
01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253
Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464
Sorry for any typos.
From: <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Jeff Neuman <jeff.neuman@comlaude.com>
Date: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 at 08:56
To: "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Fwd: Letter from the RySG's RSP Discussion Group