Dear Anne, all, I will take this opportunity to attach the PDF version, as I forgot to do so in the original message. To briefly respond to your concern, if I recall correctly, the context in which this action item was identified was in the discussions around “round” closures in the future. As there are applications still pending from the 2012 round, I believe the idea was that learnings could potentially be drawn for usage in the future by examining those pending applications. So to be clear, the intention is most definitely not for this PDP WG to attempt to resolve the pending status of any 2012 applications. Best, Steve From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrrc.com> Date: Monday, February 4, 2019 at 9:16 AM To: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>, "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: 2012 New gTLD Program - Remaining Applications Thanks Steve. We also note that substantive discussion may not be appropriate since the 2012 round is outside the scope of the work of Sub Pro based on our Charter. (At least that was the approach taken consistently – and rather strenuously - by Leadership in Work Track 4 throughout the process.) It seems the WG could make a policy recommendation as to treatment of unresolved strings applied for in the next round if that is what ICANN staff is looking for in terms of guidance. (This seemed to be what Trang was saying.) I don’ t think we can make policy recommendations about 2012 applications without an amendment to our Charter. But I don’t see any problem making policy recommendations that would apply to strings applied for in the next round that remain unresolved during subsequent rounds or during an FCFS process if approved. Anne From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Chan Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 9:59 AM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] 2012 New gTLD Program - Remaining Applications Dear WG Members, Attached, please find the remaining applications from the 2012 round of the New gTLD Program. ICANN org provided a spreadsheet that contained the remaining applications, along with basic status information (e.g., ICANN application status, evaluation result, contention set status). The WG Co-Chairs added additional information based on their analysis, as the basic status information does not provide full context; please see columns E and H as an attempt to provide some of that missing context. Notably: In column E, we have highlighted in orange applications that will not proceed but have not yet been officially withdrawn by the applicant In column H, we have highlighted in grey applications where we know additional information is needed to better understand the current status. This document will be discussed briefly during the upcoming full WG call but given the late delivery relative to that call, is not intended to be discussed in a substantive manner. Best, Steve Steven Chan
 Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
 Mobile: +1.310.339.4410 Office Telephone: +1.310.301.5800 Office Fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses [learn.icann.org] and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [gnso.icann.org]. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO [twitter.com] Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ [facebook.com] http://gnso.icann.org/en/ [gnso.icann.org] This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.