Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] [Ext] RE: Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG meeting - Monday, 21 May 2019 at 03:00 UTC
Dear Anne, All, Apologies, meant to respond on Friday and it slipped my mind. Responses inline. Best, Steve From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrrc.com> Date: Friday, May 17, 2019 at 2:49 PM To: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org>, "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Ext] RE: Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG meeting - Monday, 21 May 2019 at 03:00 UTC Thanks Steve – It would be extremely helpful going forward if Staff could provide links to the appropriate Subgroup A, B, and C chart sections as applicable to the matters being discussed at this time by the full Working Group. In other words, in the “Background Documentation” section, could we please have the links to the relevant Subgroup A, B, and C work in addition to the Community Comment 1 and the Initial Report? (We do not want to lose the benefit of all the work done by the Subgroups in this regard.) SC: Staff has added the link to the Sub Group A public comment review document for each of the sections where a summary has been produced and we will carry this practice forward. In connection with 2.2.5 Application Limits (and based on the Subgroup Chart), I believe we need to include in the Summary the fact that two comments reflected DIVERGENCE. Those would be the comments of Christopher Wilkinson noted in the SubGroup document and the comments of the Public Interest Community. The underlying Subgroup document for this issue shows two Divergent commenters. The first is Christopher Wilkinson. The second is the Public Interest Community as correctly noted in the current Summary Document. Comments of the “Public Interest Community” commenter that appear in our SubGroup chart are more properly characterized as Divergence than “Concerns”. As you have noted, this commenter is in fact arguing for strict limits of no more than “2 dozen applications for each company, including its parent company, subsidiaries, and affiliates”. Christopher’s comments are properly noted in the Subgroup Document as “Divergence”. SC: Staff has added a separate line to capture the Divergence from the Public Interest Community and Christopher Wilkinson. The additional element from the Public Interest Community, with a numerical example supporting the strict limit, is still captured as a New Idea, which should be consistent with the public comment analysis performed by Sub Group A. Separately, I see that the Summary Document has stricken the Predictability Framework section and summary public comments in favor of a new “Working Document”. Is that the document that we, as a smaller group convened on the Predictability Framework, will be working from? Can you please give the full WG a general summary as to how this new document differs from the Summary previously provided to the full Working Group? I am pasting the link to the “New Working Document” for the Predictability Framework below. SC: If you will recall, PDP leadership introduced the repackaged document on the 6 May WG meeting that you linked to below, to try and better support the discussions around the Predictability Framework. As Jeff pointed out at that time, substantively, the document does not contain new information, but is simply organized in a different manner. In order to not have duplicative documentation for the Predictability Framework, this newer version is intended to serve as a replacement. As for whether that will serve as the document the small group works from, I would imagine that would at least serve as the basis to begin discussions, but it is ultimately up to PDP leadership and the small team to determine what documentation it will use, as well as eventually produce for review by the full WG. https://docs.google.com/document/d/12_x8zYR9r6zXqfA7dmoosSPH12NmcyJ-2FEjecGr... [docs.google.com] Thank you, Anne From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Chan Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 10:55 AM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG meeting - Monday, 21 May 2019 at 03:00 UTC Dear WG members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the upcoming call on Tuesday, 21 May 2019 at 03:00 UTC for 90 minutes: Welcome/Review of the Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs) Review of Summary Documents – (see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R4zXTH3hIgfbqoxyqsSp19Bl6J96NNeV7oCgxsXK... [docs.google.com]) 2.2.4 TLD Types 2.2.5 Application Submission Limits (time permitting) AOB -- ICANN 65 Planning Note, in relation to agenda item 2, WG leadership and staff have tried to prepare summary documents for each topic that seeks to help you review some of the background material, consider a high-level summary of what we believe the WG is seeking to accomplish for the topic, a high-level summary of public comment received, and finally, a catch all at the end of each section (e.g., follow-up, parking lot, next steps). If you need a dial out or would like to send an apology for this call, please email gnso-secs@icann.org. Best, Steve Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Mobile: +1.310.339.4410 Office Telephone: +1.310.301.5800 Office Fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses [learn.icann.org] and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [gnso.icann.org]. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO [twitter.com] Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ [facebook.com] http://gnso.icann.org/en/ [gnso.icann.org] This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
Thank you Steve – very much appreciated. Anne From: Steve Chan [mailto:steve.chan@icann.org] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 11:37 AM To: Aikman-Scalese, Anne <AAikman@lrrc.com>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Ext] RE: Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG meeting - Monday, 21 May 2019 at 03:00 UTC Dear Anne, All, Apologies, meant to respond on Friday and it slipped my mind. Responses inline. Best, Steve From: "Aikman-Scalese, Anne" <AAikman@lrrc.com<mailto:AAikman@lrrc.com>> Date: Friday, May 17, 2019 at 2:49 PM To: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>>, "gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>" <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org>> Subject: [Ext] RE: Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG meeting - Monday, 21 May 2019 at 03:00 UTC Thanks Steve – It would be extremely helpful going forward if Staff could provide links to the appropriate Subgroup A, B, and C chart sections as applicable to the matters being discussed at this time by the full Working Group. In other words, in the “Background Documentation” section, could we please have the links to the relevant Subgroup A, B, and C work in addition to the Community Comment 1 and the Initial Report? (We do not want to lose the benefit of all the work done by the Subgroups in this regard.) SC: Staff has added the link to the Sub Group A public comment review document for each of the sections where a summary has been produced and we will carry this practice forward. In connection with 2.2.5 Application Limits (and based on the Subgroup Chart), I believe we need to include in the Summary the fact that two comments reflected DIVERGENCE. Those would be the comments of Christopher Wilkinson noted in the SubGroup document and the comments of the Public Interest Community. The underlying Subgroup document for this issue shows two Divergent commenters. The first is Christopher Wilkinson. The second is the Public Interest Community as correctly noted in the current Summary Document. Comments of the “Public Interest Community” commenter that appear in our SubGroup chart are more properly characterized as Divergence than “Concerns”. As you have noted, this commenter is in fact arguing for strict limits of no more than “2 dozen applications for each company, including its parent company, subsidiaries, and affiliates”. Christopher’s comments are properly noted in the Subgroup Document as “Divergence”. SC: Staff has added a separate line to capture the Divergence from the Public Interest Community and Christopher Wilkinson. The additional element from the Public Interest Community, with a numerical example supporting the strict limit, is still captured as a New Idea, which should be consistent with the public comment analysis performed by Sub Group A. Separately, I see that the Summary Document has stricken the Predictability Framework section and summary public comments in favor of a new “Working Document”. Is that the document that we, as a smaller group convened on the Predictability Framework, will be working from? Can you please give the full WG a general summary as to how this new document differs from the Summary previously provided to the full Working Group? I am pasting the link to the “New Working Document” for the Predictability Framework below. SC: If you will recall, PDP leadership introduced the repackaged document on the 6 May WG meeting that you linked to below, to try and better support the discussions around the Predictability Framework. As Jeff pointed out at that time, substantively, the document does not contain new information, but is simply organized in a different manner. In order to not have duplicative documentation for the Predictability Framework, this newer version is intended to serve as a replacement. As for whether that will serve as the document the small group works from, I would imagine that would at least serve as the basis to begin discussions, but it is ultimately up to PDP leadership and the small team to determine what documentation it will use, as well as eventually produce for review by the full WG. https://docs.google.com/document/d/12_x8zYR9r6zXqfA7dmoosSPH12NmcyJ-2FEjecGr... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...> Thank you, Anne From: Gnso-newgtld-wg [mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Steve Chan Sent: Friday, May 17, 2019 10:55 AM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Proposed Agenda - New gTLD Subsequent Procedures PDP WG meeting - Monday, 21 May 2019 at 03:00 UTC Dear WG members, Please find below the proposed agenda for the upcoming call on Tuesday, 21 May 2019 at 03:00 UTC for 90 minutes: 1. Welcome/Review of the Agenda/Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs) 2. Review of Summary Documents – (see: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1R4zXTH3hIgfbqoxyqsSp19Bl6J96NNeV7oCgxsXK... [docs.google.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen...>) * 2.2.4 TLD Types * 2.2.5 Application Submission Limits (time permitting) 3. AOB -- ICANN 65 Planning Note, in relation to agenda item 2, WG leadership and staff have tried to prepare summary documents for each topic that seeks to help you review some of the background material, consider a high-level summary of what we believe the WG is seeking to accomplish for the topic, a high-level summary of public comment received, and finally, a catch all at the end of each section (e.g., follow-up, parking lot, next steps). If you need a dial out or would like to send an apology for this call, please email gnso-secs@icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org>. Best, Steve Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Mobile: +1.310.339.4410 Office Telephone: +1.310.301.5800 Office Fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses [learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__learn.icann.org_&d=DwMG...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO [twitter.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ICANN-5FGNS...> Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ [facebook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_icanng...> http://gnso.icann.org/en/ [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_&d=DwM...> ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521. ________________________________ This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
participants (2)
-
Aikman-Scalese, Anne -
Steve Chan