Mp3, Attendance, AC Recording & AC Chat from New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG call on Tuesday, 07 March 2017
Dear All, Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the MP3 recording below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group call held on Tuesday, 07 March 2017 at 20:00 UTC. Attendance of the calls is also posted on the agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/Ha-RAw MP3: <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-08sep16-en.mp3> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-07mar17-en.mp3 The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/Ha-RAw Thank you. Kind regards, Michelle ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for Tuesday, 07 March 2017 Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG call on Tuesday, 07 March 2017 at 20:00 UTC. Michelle DeSmyter:Meeting page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_H... Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:loud and clear. Alexander Schubert:Feels to me like "Groundhog day"...... https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.youtube.com_watch-3... Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:loud and clear, avri. Emily Barabas:Please note, we are working with a new Google Document: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_documen... Emily Barabas:If you would like to read along in the Google Doc, please use this link Emily Barabas:The document is not synced Emily Barabas:everyone can scroll Emily Barabas:the formatting of the redline in the pod and the google doc look a little different, but the content of the edits is the same. jeff neuman:I like periodic... jeff neuman:but that is just me Donna Austin, Neustar:agree with Jeff jeff neuman:Should we say "a RSP" or "an RSP" Sara Bockey:a RSP, I think Donna Austin, Neustar:agree with Sara jeff neuman:I know the general rule is you only use "an" before a word that starts with a vowel...but it sounds weird jeff neuman:again that is just me Donna Austin, Neustar:if we spell out RSP it would be 'a registry service provider' jeff neuman:true Alexander Schubert:1.1.7 should be periodic in my opinion - as it doesn't involve any publishing. Steve Chan:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qutP4I6fpyTtH4uSgLqsSFDn7082Guexr7gU8YD7... Steve Chan:Apologies if we've gotten the sentiment wrong, but not a lot of details in the placeholder. Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:support for 1.5.3. as it is worded. jeff neuman:@Steve - you got it right jeff neuman:have some confidence :) Alexander Schubert:In 1.7.1 we should ask in a way that would allow to create this answer: No "draw" needed when we issue a random number during application submission - then use that random number in an algorithm that creates a queue! This who wish to be at the end of the quezuecan indicate at application submission. jeff neuman:SHould we use "category" Alexander Schubert:Sorry typos: "Those who wish to be at the end of the queue can indicate at application submission." Alexander Schubert:Regarding my previous post! Alexander Schubert:In WT2 I still miss any question about 2.2.1.4.1 Treatment of Country or Territory Names ..... Heather Forrest:Interim report of CWG-UCTN has been published for comment Steve Chan:Further to Heather's comment, it was published on 24 Feb here: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2D... jeff neuman:yes Heather Forrest:To put a finer point on Alexander's comment, the group as a whole has not agreed because the scope of the group's work was very narrow. Certainly the partifcipants have views that need to be discussed here in the PDP. jeff neuman:But we will address that issue when the CWG is done. Donna Austin, Neustar:should there be a note mentioning that country and territory names have been left out of this exercise for x reason Alexander Schubert:Footnote that we deal with it later! Steve Chan:Jeff, you deleted it :) Donna Austin, Neustar:yep Justine Chew:Yes Heather Forrest:Excellent question! jeff neuman:I would like to hear from Paul Heather Forrest:Sorry - slow to post check mark for Option 1. It's wordy, but if there are 'yes' answers out there, this group should hear them jeff neuman:Understood. We can start with a word other than "should" jeff neuman:Structured and/or evaluated? Justine Chew:Yes Steve Chan:Yes, thanks jeff neuman:3.4.6 is new jeff neuman:so let people read jeff neuman:the CCWG on Auction Proceeds is not discussing how auctions work or why they exist jeff neuman:it is only talking about the use of funds jeff neuman:@Avri - correct Julie Hedlund:@Avri: That is correct. Only the funding. Greg Shatan:Actually, they're talking about the mechanisms for deciding how to spend the money. Greg Shatan:Others will then decide how to spend the money using those mechanisms. jeff neuman:only 1/4 of a billion :) Greg Shatan:You got it.... Greg Shatan:Rounding error. Trang Nguyen:4.3.2.3 The AGB criteria did not include evaluation of an applicant's business model. Meaning, Q18 was not evaluated. And the projections in Q46 was not evaluated against the proposed business model in Q18. jeff neuman:I am fine with that Trang Nguyen:yes Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):if we drop then do ask for the any other comments jeff neuman:Is anybody out there? Greg Shatan:Agree with dropping the question. Martin Sutton:Fine to drop q Greg Shatan:4 3 2 6 ask or both. Greg Shatan:Please see chat Greg Shatan:at application time, at contract signing time, or at both times? Greg Shatan:Sounds good Greg Shatan:I have no voice Greg Shatan:and I must scream jeff neuman:You better get it back before friday ;) Steve Chan:There is a similar question in the technical section. If there are no objections, I'll make the same change there. Greg Shatan:Just not pluigged in. Bonus points for literary reference in my prior interventions.. Trang Nguyen:That timing question probably applies to background screening as well. jeff neuman:no objection Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):fine Paul McGrady:"Additional Questions" Julie Hedlund:Could just say "data"? Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):data points refers to any discreet unit of information Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):usually in an analytical context Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):it is an Observation Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:"data points" is quite common as a stan ding expression, I believe. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):can be single or multiple measures Alexander Schubert:Noun 1. data point - an item of factual information derived from measurement or research Rudy Mendoza:agreed Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:yes, please keep it. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):can also be seen as a term in multifactorial statistical analysis Paul McGrady:Excellent Avri! Great run through the document. Martin Sutton:well done Sara Bockey:Great job, Avri! Alexander Schubert:I second Kavouss Martin Sutton:well said Kavouss Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:kavouss' motion seconded! Trang Nguyen:Thanks, All! Bye! Donna Austin, Neustar:well done Avri Alexander Schubert:Bye! Sara Bockey:thanks everyone Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):bye Martin Sutton:thx, bye Christopher Niemi:Thank you! Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:thanks, all - bye. Heather Forrest:Safe travels, everyone - thanks Avri and Jeff
Dear Michelle, Thanks for the updates, apologies for not attending my first today other engagements took me. Kind Regards Poncelet On 8 March 2017 at 00:46, Michelle DeSmyter <michelle.desmyter@icann.org> wrote:
Dear All,
Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the MP3 recording below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group call held on Tuesday, 07 March 2017 at 20:00 UTC. Attendance of the calls is also posted on the agenda wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/Ha-RAw
*MP3: * <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-08sep16-en.mp3> http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-07mar17-en.mp3
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar <http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov>
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/
Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/Ha-RAw
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Michelle
-------------------------------
*Adobe Connect chat transcript for Tuesday**, 07 March 2017* Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG call on Tuesday, 07 March 2017 at 20:00 UTC. Michelle DeSmyter:Meeting page: https://urldefense. proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_Ha- 2DRAw&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_ WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m= GpkcbbtPvo5J88YbJtlLSGRaVH9F4nm4hDlRQcORVdg&s=DvDKTC9jFEUKRMqYQlIhI9Alq_ TZWbGpREM3IT_HUKE&e= Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:loud and clear. Alexander Schubert:Feels to me like "Groundhog day"...... https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- 3A__www.youtube.com_watch-3Fv-3DeZbtAFq7dP8&d=DwIFaQ&c= FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_ WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m= GpkcbbtPvo5J88YbJtlLSGRaVH9F4nm4hDlRQcORVdg&s=8_lM4V5qcRrUef_HJLt_ F3ENhFGLeyVEh0lQdyKNtbM&e= Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:loud and clear, avri. Emily Barabas:Please note, we are working with a new Google Document: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- 3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1qutP4I6fpyTtH4uSgLqsSFDn7082G uexr7gU8YD78Zg_edit-23&d=DwIFaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6 sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_ 5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m=GpkcbbtPvo5J88YbJtlLSGRaVH9F4nm4hDlRQcORVdg&s= UamAK7GaGVkTFfsbAF_7eWvHIROpUXGo23xmryO7vow&e= Emily Barabas:If you would like to read along in the Google Doc, please use this link Emily Barabas:The document is not synced Emily Barabas:everyone can scroll Emily Barabas:the formatting of the redline in the pod and the google doc look a little different, but the content of the edits is the same. jeff neuman:I like periodic... jeff neuman:but that is just me Donna Austin, Neustar:agree with Jeff jeff neuman:Should we say "a RSP" or "an RSP" Sara Bockey:a RSP, I think Donna Austin, Neustar:agree with Sara jeff neuman:I know the general rule is you only use "an" before a word that starts with a vowel...but it sounds weird jeff neuman:again that is just me Donna Austin, Neustar:if we spell out RSP it would be 'a registry service provider' jeff neuman:true Alexander Schubert:1.1.7 should be periodic in my opinion - as it doesn't involve any publishing. Steve Chan:https://docs.google.com/document/d/ 1qutP4I6fpyTtH4uSgLqsSFDn7082Guexr7gU8YD78Zg/edit# Steve Chan:Apologies if we've gotten the sentiment wrong, but not a lot of details in the placeholder. Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:support for 1.5.3. as it is worded. jeff neuman:@Steve - you got it right jeff neuman:have some confidence :) Alexander Schubert:In 1.7.1 we should ask in a way that would allow to create this answer: No "draw" needed when we issue a random number during application submission - then use that random number in an algorithm that creates a queue! This who wish to be at the end of the quezuecan indicate at application submission. jeff neuman:SHould we use "category" Alexander Schubert:Sorry typos: "Those who wish to be at the end of the queue can indicate at application submission." Alexander Schubert:Regarding my previous post! Alexander Schubert:In WT2 I still miss any question about 2.2.1.4.1 Treatment of Country or Territory Names ..... Heather Forrest:Interim report of CWG-UCTN has been published for comment Steve Chan:Further to Heather's comment, it was published on 24 Feb here: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- 3A__www.icann.org_public-2Dcomments_cwg-2Ductn- 2Dinterim-2Dpaper-2D2017-2D02-2D24-2Den&d=DwIFaQ&c= FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=8_ WhWIPqsLT6TmF1Zmyci866vcPSFO4VShFqESGe_5iHWGlBLwwwehFBfjrsjWv9&m= GpkcbbtPvo5J88YbJtlLSGRaVH9F4nm4hDlRQcORVdg&s=v9GW6BVdihBWfuiEN_ 5cKMHuAoLYwhLvIBXSKrASa9o&e= jeff neuman:yes Heather Forrest:To put a finer point on Alexander's comment, the group as a whole has not agreed because the scope of the group's work was very narrow. Certainly the partifcipants have views that need to be discussed here in the PDP. jeff neuman:But we will address that issue when the CWG is done. Donna Austin, Neustar:should there be a note mentioning that country and territory names have been left out of this exercise for x reason Alexander Schubert:Footnote that we deal with it later! Steve Chan:Jeff, you deleted it :) Donna Austin, Neustar:yep Justine Chew:Yes Heather Forrest:Excellent question! jeff neuman:I would like to hear from Paul Heather Forrest:Sorry - slow to post check mark for Option 1. It's wordy, but if there are 'yes' answers out there, this group should hear them jeff neuman:Understood. We can start with a word other than "should" jeff neuman:Structured and/or evaluated? Justine Chew:Yes Steve Chan:Yes, thanks jeff neuman:3.4.6 is new jeff neuman:so let people read jeff neuman:the CCWG on Auction Proceeds is not discussing how auctions work or why they exist jeff neuman:it is only talking about the use of funds jeff neuman:@Avri - correct Julie Hedlund:@Avri: That is correct. Only the funding. Greg Shatan:Actually, they're talking about the mechanisms for deciding how to spend the money. Greg Shatan:Others will then decide how to spend the money using those mechanisms. jeff neuman:only 1/4 of a billion :) Greg Shatan:You got it.... Greg Shatan:Rounding error. Trang Nguyen:4.3.2.3 The AGB criteria did not include evaluation of an applicant’s business model. Meaning, Q18 was not evaluated. And the projections in Q46 was not evaluated against the proposed business model in Q18. jeff neuman:I am fine with that Trang Nguyen:yes Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):if we drop then do ask for the any other comments jeff neuman:Is anybody out there? Greg Shatan:Agree with dropping the question. Martin Sutton:Fine to drop q Greg Shatan:4 3 2 6 ask or both. Greg Shatan:Please see chat Greg Shatan:at application time, at contract signing time, or at both times? Greg Shatan:Sounds good Greg Shatan:I have no voice Greg Shatan:and I must scream jeff neuman:You better get it back before friday ;) Steve Chan:There is a similar question in the technical section. If there are no objections, I'll make the same change there. Greg Shatan:Just not pluigged in. Bonus points for literary reference in my prior interventions.. Trang Nguyen:That timing question probably applies to background screening as well. jeff neuman:no objection Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):fine Paul McGrady:"Additional Questions" Julie Hedlund:Could just say "data"? Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):data points refers to any discreet unit of information Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):usually in an analytical context Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):it is an Observation Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:"data points" is quite common as a stan ding expression, I believe. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):can be single or multiple measures Alexander Schubert:Noun 1. data point - an item of factual information derived from measurement or research Rudy Mendoza:agreed Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:yes, please keep it. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):can also be seen as a term in multifactorial statistical analysis Paul McGrady:Excellent Avri! Great run through the document. Martin Sutton:well done Sara Bockey:Great job, Avri! Alexander Schubert:I second Kavouss Martin Sutton:well said Kavouss Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:kavouss' motion seconded! Trang Nguyen:Thanks, All! Bye! Donna Austin, Neustar:well done Avri Alexander Schubert:Bye! Sara Bockey:thanks everyone Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):bye Martin Sutton:thx, bye Christopher Niemi:Thank you! Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:thanks, all - bye. Heather Forrest:Safe travels, everyone - thanks Avri and Jeff
_______________________________________________ Gnso-newgtld-wg mailing list Gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-newgtld-wg
-- Poncelet O. Ileleji MBCS Coordinator The Gambia YMCAs Computer Training Centre & Digital Studio MDI Road Kanifing South P. O. Box 421 Banjul The Gambia, West Africa Tel: (220) 4370240 Fax:(220) 4390793 Cell:(220) 9912508 Skype: pons_utd *www.ymca.gm <http://www.ymca.gm>http://jokkolabs.net/en/ <http://jokkolabs.net/en/>www.waigf.org <http://www.waigf.org>www,insistglobal.com <http://www.itag.gm>www.npoc.org <http://www.npoc.org>http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753 <http://www.wsa-mobile.org/node/753>*www.diplointernetgovernance.org
participants (2)
-
Michelle DeSmyter -
Poncelet Ileleji