Dear All, Please find the attendance of the call attached to this email and the MP3 recording below for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group call held on Monday, 30 January 2017 at 15:00 UTC. Attendance of the calls is also posted on the agenda wiki page: MP3: http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-30jan17-en.mp3 <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-08sep16-en.mp3> The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master Calendar page: http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar<http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#nov> ** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list ** Mailing list archives: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-newgtld-wg/ Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/krHDAw <http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-new-gtld-subsequent-30jan17-en.mp3> Thank you. Kind regards, Michelle ------------------------------- Adobe Connect chat transcript for Monday, 30 January 2017 Michelle DeSmyter:Dear All, Welcome to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group call on Monday, 30 January 2017 at 15:00 UTC. Michelle DeSmyter:Meeting page: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_x_k... Kavouss Arasteh:Pls kindly advise to dial me up Kavouss Arasteh:Pls kindkly advise to dial me up Kavouss Arasteh:Kavouss Kavouss Arasteh:Pls kindly advise for dial up Kavouss Arasteh:Dear Stve Karen Day:avri you are very very quite Kavouss Arasteh:It is a headacke to attend this meeting$ Steve Chan:Kavouss, Michelle is having some AC issues. I've just let her know to provide you with a dial out. Vaibhav Aggarwal, NCSG:Hello Team Vaibhav Aggarwal, NCSG:Greetings Kavouss Arasteh 2:PLS PLS SPEAK SLOWLYT Vaibhav Aggarwal, NCSG:Excellent Point Vaibhav Aggarwal, NCSG::-) Kavouss Arasteh 2:NOISE Jeff Neuman:Sara, we will come back to you Jeff Neuman:Michael? Jeff Neuman:yes Vanda Scartezini:good morning from LA. I can stay just half hour - I am here fro an ICANN regional meeting that will start in half hour Jeff Neuman:Terms of Use Jeff Neuman:for the Application Kavouss Arasteh 2:Terms and Conditions on what pls ? Jeff Neuman:Module 6 of the Applicant Guidebook Kavouss Arasteh 2:Then we should say that Sara Bockey:i hear a fax Jeff Neuman:This has been a test of the emergency broadcast system Rubens Kuhl:Karen, you need to rewind a little. Jeff Neuman:Someone is breathing heavy on the phone Robin Gross:sounds good, thanks! Susan Payne:thanks! Kavouss Arasteh 2:I prefer e-mail. I have difficulties to read Google Doc. Jeff Neuman:nope Jim Prendergast:yes Phil Buckingham:If WT2 participants could fill out the doodle poll on a suggested time change ( after our next call 2 February ) - that would be much appreciated. . Michael and myself would prefer a later time than the current 20.00 UTC - up to 24.00 UTC on alternate Thursdays . Please put you suggestions to the list ..Thks . Kavouss Arasteh 2:May we take it Pra. by Pra. pls Jon Nevett:The application fee question seems to be pretty leading imo Vanda Scartezini:agree Kavouss Arasteh 2:What is the criteria to decide or identify who is middle applicant Vanda Scartezini: yes Kavouss - i will need to leave for another meeting here in ICANN - will read it later on. have a productive meeting Phil Buckingham:so is the cost ( recovery ) to be flexed according to the number of applications ? Phil Buckingham:it is a cart before the horse scenario Sara Bockey:Sure, no problem Jon Nevett:take out the givens Jon Nevett:but happy to do it offline Jon Nevett:sounds good Jon Nevett:you got it Kavouss Arasteh 2:Should there be some sort of periodical review of cost recovery value Steve Chan:@Jeff, maybe we could ask a question related to Phil's question re: the unknown number of incoming applications? Rubens Kuhl:I think the recurring fees is more of a deterrance to squatting than application fees, unless they move into 7-digits. Jeff Neuman:All good questions to add Trang Nguyen:A reminder that a portion of the $185K was allocated to the risk fund. Whatever the method to be used in the future should consider how the risk fund should be accounted for. Rubens Kuhl:It seems that part of the users are connected to others with a high delay. Quite possibly the AC to phone bridge link. Alexander.gay:Please also factor in "abuse": Porfolio applicants will simply form shell companies in "developing countries" to save fees! Kavouss Arasteh 2:THere is more than one cost recovery model as well as more than one method on how to calculate cost recovery fees Alexander.gay:The lottery could be BUILT IN by a random number assignment during aplication! Alexander.gay:*application Steve Chan:Channeling ICANN legal, I would suggest using a different word than lottery. Jeff Neuman:@steve....how about "sweepstakes" :) Vaibhav Aggarwal, NCSG:Shell Companies need to go through Veetting process of the APplicant Vaibhav Aggarwal, NCSG:that is already part of the process Vaibhav Aggarwal, NCSG:@jeff :-) Steve Chan:As long as it's not lottery and is able to be legally supported by ICANN, sure! :) Rubens Kuhl:Alexander, that can be dealt with by defining registration restrictions that larger operators wouldn't like. If applicant support requires not selling to registrants in OECD countries, (Spec 12 Registration Restrictions, as for Community TLDs), no commercial interest doing so. Alexander.gay:90 Alexander.gay:In my opinion the period of actual application acceptance doesn't really matter. What matters is that there is sufficient time to create a meaningful application once the deadline is announced! Donna Austin, Neustar:Application Submission Period may want to include questions about advertising the submission period. Donna Austin, Neustar:Correct Jeff Alexander.gay:The portfolio applicants can churn out run of the mill applications within 24h. But if we want MEANINGFUL applications by for example geo entities or communities: They need time to put togeher consensus policy! Steve Chan:@Kavouss., I've updated the header from "WT" to "Work Track" in the Google document Vaibhav Aggarwal, NCSG:Appologies have to rush for another meeting. will catch up on the notes :-) Vaibhav Aggarwal, NCSG:Have a good One Kavouss Arasteh 2:Avri, are we on section 3 pls Sara Bockey:Kavouss you are a bit muffled. Can you speak louder? Steve Chan:Staff will make sure the questions are provided in the same place (e.g., in the table above or in the Annex) Rubens Kuhl:A possible question would be on possible implementations of community priority. Priority can be different from death warrants for non-community applicants. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):comments only open until EOM for WT4 Rubens Kuhl:Tks Kavouss. Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):BYE Katrin Ohlmer, DOTZON:Bye, all - see/hear next time. Sara Bockey:thanks all!