Operational protections for registrants
Hi Jeff, Cheryl and All,Tx for a good meeting yesterday. On a small note, I did not hear any objections to my suggestion that we rename yesterday's section slightly to "Operational protections for registrants." This reflects the scope that Jeff presented and his intro and a clearer picture of the EBERO issues of the matter. I would ask leadership to consider for clarity. Tx much, Kathy
Kathy, For consistency sake and ease of comparing this Final Report to the Draft Final Report and the Initial Report as well as the Constituency Comments 1 and 2, leadership is going to keep the name of the section as-is. Although some of the “Registrant Protections” are spread throughout the report in various sections and this section mostly covers the EBERO functionality, given that we are at the end of the process, we are better off leaving things as is. If the IRT and those working on the Applicant Guidebook would like to change the overall title, they are of course free to do so. Thanks. Sincerely, Jeff [cid:image001.png@01D6CD4A.C98FD950] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff@jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 9:25 AM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Operational protections for registrants Hi Jeff, Cheryl and All, Tx for a good meeting yesterday. On a small note, I did not hear any objections to my suggestion that we rename yesterday's section slightly to "Operational protections for registrants." This reflects the scope that Jeff presented and his intro and a clearer picture of the EBERO issues of the matter I would ask leadership to consider for clarity. Tx much, Kathy
And just to note that there was also objection to changing the language during the call yesterday, I think from Susan Payne and I. From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Jeff Neuman Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 7:14 AM To: Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Operational protections for registrants Notice: This email is from an external sender. Kathy, For consistency sake and ease of comparing this Final Report to the Draft Final Report and the Initial Report as well as the Constituency Comments 1 and 2, leadership is going to keep the name of the section as-is. Although some of the “Registrant Protections” are spread throughout the report in various sections and this section mostly covers the EBERO functionality, given that we are at the end of the process, we are better off leaving things as is. If the IRT and those working on the Applicant Guidebook would like to change the overall title, they are of course free to do so. Thanks. Sincerely, Jeff [cid:image002.png@01D6CD4B.9D2EF570] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff@jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 9:25 AM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Operational protections for registrants Hi Jeff, Cheryl and All, Tx for a good meeting yesterday. On a small note, I did not hear any objections to my suggestion that we rename yesterday's section slightly to "Operational protections for registrants." This reflects the scope that Jeff presented and his intro and a clearer picture of the EBERO issues of the matter I would ask leadership to consider for clarity. Tx much, Kathy
Thanks Donna, yes that’s correct. These are registrant protections and I think it would be extremely confusing for the wider community to change the name at this late stage when we’ve been using this term throughout. Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Donna@registry.godaddy <Donna@registry.godaddy> Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 6:19:31 PM To: Jeff Neuman <jeff@jjnsolutions.com>; Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org <gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Operational protections for registrants And just to note that there was also objection to changing the language during the call yesterday, I think from Susan Payne and I. From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org> On Behalf Of Jeff Neuman Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 7:14 AM To: Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com>; gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org Subject: Re: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Operational protections for registrants Notice: This email is from an external sender. Kathy, For consistency sake and ease of comparing this Final Report to the Draft Final Report and the Initial Report as well as the Constituency Comments 1 and 2, leadership is going to keep the name of the section as-is. Although some of the “Registrant Protections” are spread throughout the report in various sections and this section mostly covers the EBERO functionality, given that we are at the end of the process, we are better off leaving things as is. If the IRT and those working on the Applicant Guidebook would like to change the overall title, they are of course free to do so. Thanks. Sincerely, Jeff [cid:image002.png@01D6CD4B.9D2EF570] Jeffrey J. Neuman Founder & CEO JJN Solutions, LLC p: +1.202.549.5079 E: jeff@jjnsolutions.com<mailto:jeff@jjnsolutions.com> http://jjnsolutions.com From: Gnso-newgtld-wg <gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg-bounces@icann.org>> On Behalf Of Kathy Kleiman Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2020 9:25 AM To: gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org<mailto:gnso-newgtld-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-newgtld-wg] Operational protections for registrants Hi Jeff, Cheryl and All, Tx for a good meeting yesterday. On a small note, I did not hear any objections to my suggestion that we rename yesterday's section slightly to "Operational protections for registrants." This reflects the scope that Jeff presented and his intro and a clearer picture of the EBERO issues of the matter I would ask leadership to consider for clarity. Tx much, Kathy ________________________________ The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient. They may not be disclosed, used by or copied in any way by anyone other than the intended recipient. If you have received this message in error, please return it to the sender (deleting the body of the email and attachments in your reply) and immediately and permanently delete it. Please note that the Com Laude Group does not accept any responsibility for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan or otherwise check this email and any attachments. The Com Laude Group does not accept liability for statements which are clearly the sender's own and not made on behalf of the group or one of its member entities. The Com Laude Group includes Nom-IQ Limited t/a Com Laude, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 5047655 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Valideus Limited, a company registered in England and Wales with company number 06181291 and registered office at 28-30 Little Russell Street, London, WC1A 2HN England; Demys Limited, a company registered in Scotland with company number SC197176, having its registered office at 15 William Street, South West Lane, Edinburgh, EH3 7LL Scotland; Consonum, Inc. dba Com Laude USA and Valideus USA, headquartered at 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600, McLean, VA 22102, USA; Com Laude (Japan) Corporation, a company registered in Japan having its registered office at Suite 319,1-3-21 Shinkawa, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0033, Japan. For further information see www.comlaude.com<https://comlaude.com>
participants (4)
-
Donna@registry.godaddy -
Jeff Neuman -
Kathy Kleiman -
Susan Payne