Hello Team, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the PDP 3.0 Small Team Meeting on Monday 15 April at 13.00 UTC Welcome and roll call Review of work plan Understanding the format Determining if changes should be made (e.g., to make it more achievable) Review of topics from last meeting and agreement on next steps #1. (Terms of participation for WG members): Review EPDP Statement of Participation and consult with EPDP Team / leadership what impact, if any, the statement of participation has had. Is this complete? #14. (flexibility of PDP): Develop draft set of criteria to evaluate request for data gathering and document this as a checklist to be used by a PDP WG. Is this complete? #13. (Review of Working Group Leadership): Continue work of the SPS sub-group to make specific PDP 3.0 implementation recommendations. Discussion on next steps. Begin review of next topics: #11. (Enforce deadlines and ensure bite size pieces): Adapt fact sheet that is being used for EPDP Team to template so it can also be used for other efforts (staff is exploring possible integration with CRM / PM tools). Comments or suggestions on the draft? #9. Provide further guidance for sections 3.6 and clarification of section 3.7 (Appeal Process) (Standard Methodology for decision making): Develop briefing document as well as slides to explain concept of “consensus” in the PDP. Discussion on the draft. Further changes needed before turning into a slide deck? #2. Consider alternatives to open WG model: Prepare a comparison table for the proposed Working Group models, which could include several factors: membership eligibility, operating procedures, decision-making, communicating decision-making, urgency/timing (e.g., prioritization). Consider creating pros/cons as well. (Action item coming out of Council SPS 2019). Discussion on draft. AOB If you have any questions or suggested changes, please let me know. Best, Steve Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Mobile: +1.310.339.4410 Office Telephone: +1.310.301.5800 Office Fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/
Dear all, I would like to register my apologies as i will be missing this meeting. I will be flying at that specific time. Regards, Arsene Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Apr 2019, at 06:35, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote:
Hello Team,
Below, please find the proposed agenda for the PDP 3.0 Small Team Meeting on Monday 15 April at 13.00 UTC
Welcome and roll call Review of work plan Understanding the format Determining if changes should be made (e.g., to make it more achievable) Review of topics from last meeting and agreement on next steps #1. (Terms of participation for WG members): Review EPDP Statement of Participation and consult with EPDP Team / leadership what impact, if any, the statement of participation has had. Is this complete? #14. (flexibility of PDP): Develop draft set of criteria to evaluate request for data gathering and document this as a checklist to be used by a PDP WG. Is this complete? #13. (Review of Working Group Leadership): Continue work of the SPS sub-group to make specific PDP 3.0 implementation recommendations. Discussion on next steps. Begin review of next topics: #11. (Enforce deadlines and ensure bite size pieces): Adapt fact sheet that is being used for EPDP Team to template so it can also be used for other efforts (staff is exploring possible integration with CRM / PM tools). Comments or suggestions on the draft? #9. Provide further guidance for sections 3.6 and clarification of section 3.7 (Appeal Process) (Standard Methodology for decision making): Develop briefing document as well as slides to explain concept of “consensus” in the PDP. Discussion on the draft. Further changes needed before turning into a slide deck? #2. Consider alternatives to open WG model: Prepare a comparison table for the proposed Working Group models, which could include several factors: membership eligibility, operating procedures, decision-making, communicating decision-making, urgency/timing (e.g., prioritization). Consider creating pros/cons as well. (Action item coming out of Council SPS 2019). Discussion on draft. AOB
If you have any questions or suggested changes, please let me know.
Best, Steve
Steven Chan > Policy Director, GNSO Support
ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 > Mobile: +1.310.339.4410 Office Telephone: +1.310.301.5800 Office Fax: +1.310.823.8649
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages.
Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ http://gnso.icann.org/en/
Dear Arsène, Thank you for this, your apology has been noted. Kind regards, Nathalie From: GNSO-PDP3Dot0-DT <gnso-pdp3dot0-dt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Arsène Tungali <arsenebaguma@gmail.com> Date: Friday, April 12, 2019 at 7:41 AM To: Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> Cc: "gnso-pdp3dot0-dt@icann.org" <gnso-pdp3dot0-dt@icann.org> Subject: Re: [GNSO-PDP3Dot0-DT] Proposed agenda GNSO PDP 3.0 Dear all, I would like to register my apologies as i will be missing this meeting. I will be flying at that specific time. Regards, Arsene Sent from my iPhone On 12 Apr 2019, at 06:35, Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org<mailto:steve.chan@icann.org>> wrote: Hello Team, Below, please find the proposed agenda for the PDP 3.0 Small Team Meeting on Monday 15 April at 13.00 UTC 1. Welcome and roll call 2. Review of work plan * Understanding the format * Determining if changes should be made (e.g., to make it more achievable) 1. Review of topics from last meeting and agreement on next steps * #1. (Terms of participation for WG members): Review EPDP Statement of Participation and consult with EPDP Team / leadership what impact, if any, the statement of participation has had. Is this complete? * #14. (flexibility of PDP): Develop draft set of criteria to evaluate request for data gathering and document this as a checklist to be used by a PDP WG. Is this complete? * #13. (Review of Working Group Leadership): Continue work of the SPS sub-group to make specific PDP 3.0 implementation recommendations. Discussion on next steps. 1. Begin review of next topics: * #11. (Enforce deadlines and ensure bite size pieces): Adapt fact sheet that is being used for EPDP Team to template so it can also be used for other efforts (staff is exploring possible integration with CRM / PM tools). Comments or suggestions on the draft? * #9. Provide further guidance for sections 3.6 and clarification of section 3.7 (Appeal Process) (Standard Methodology for decision making): Develop briefing document as well as slides to explain concept of “consensus” in the PDP. Discussion on the draft. Further changes needed before turning into a slide deck? * #2. Consider alternatives to open WG model: Prepare a comparison table for the proposed Working Group models, which could include several factors: membership eligibility, operating procedures, decision-making, communicating decision-making, urgency/timing (e.g., prioritization). Consider creating pros/cons as well. (Action item coming out of Council SPS 2019). Discussion on draft. 1. AOB If you have any questions or suggested changes, please let me know. Best, Steve Steven Chan Policy Director, GNSO Support ICANN 12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300 Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 Mobile: +1.310.339.4410 Office Telephone: +1.310.301.5800 Office Fax: +1.310.823.8649 Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses [learn.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__learn.icann.org_&d=DwMF...> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gns...>. Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO [twitter.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_ICANN-5FGNS...> Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/ [facebook.com]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_icanng...> http://gnso.icann.org/en/ [gnso.icann.org]<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_en_&d=DwM...>
Like last time, this seems quite ambitious for a 1-hour meeting. For future meetings, maybe we can plan an agenda that's a little less ambitious. It's not always possible for some of us to extend the meeting even just a few minutes due to other obligations. Thanks. Darcy On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:35 PM Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote:
Hello Team,
Below, please find the proposed agenda for the *PDP 3.0 Small Team Meeting on Monday 15 April at 13.00 UTC*
1. Welcome and roll call 2. Review of work plan 1. Understanding the format 2. Determining if changes should be made (e.g., to make it more achievable) 3. Review of topics from last meeting and agreement on next steps
1. #1. (Terms of participation for WG members): *Review EPDP Statement of Participation and consult with EPDP Team / leadership what impact, if any, the statement of participation has had.* *Is this complete?* 2. #14. (flexibility of PDP): *Develop draft set of criteria to evaluate request for data gathering and document this as a checklist to be used by a PDP WG.* *Is this complete?* 3. #13. (Review of Working Group Leadership): *Continue work of the SPS sub-group to make specific PDP 3.0 implementation recommendations.* *Discussion on next steps.* 1. Begin review of next topics:
1. #11. (Enforce deadlines and ensure bite size pieces): *Adapt fact sheet that is being used for EPDP Team to template so it can also be used for other efforts (staff is exploring possible integration with CRM / PM tools).* *Comments or suggestions on the draft?* 2. #9. Provide further guidance for sections 3.6 and clarification of section 3.7 (Appeal Process) (Standard Methodology for decision making): *Develop briefing document as well as slides to explain concept of “consensus” in the PDP.* *Discussion on the draft. Further changes needed before turning into a slide deck?* 3. #2. Consider alternatives to open WG model: *Prepare a comparison table for the proposed Working Group models, which could include several factors: membership eligibility, operating procedures, decision-making, communicating decision-making, urgency/timing (e.g., prioritization). Consider creating pros/cons as well. (Action item coming out of Council SPS 2019).* *Discussion on draft.* 1. AOB
If you have any questions or suggested changes, please let me know.
Best,
Steve
*Steven Chan*
Policy Director, GNSO Support
*ICANN*
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Mobile: +1.310.339.4410
Office Telephone: +1.310.301.5800
Office Fax: +1.310.823.8649
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://learn.icann.org/> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...> .
Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO
Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/
_______________________________________________ GNSO-PDP3Dot0-DT mailing list GNSO-PDP3Dot0-DT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-pdp3dot0-dt
Hi Darcy, Point taken and we can trim the agenda. Just as explanation, several of those items can be dealt quickly as we are supposed to confirm the status (completed or not) based on discussion in slack channels and the review. For others, the goal is to introduce the new items to be reviewed in the coming 2 weeks but necessarily having substantive discussion on the content during the call. Best, Rafik Le sam. 13 avr. 2019 à 04:24, Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@endurance.com> a écrit :
Like last time, this seems quite ambitious for a 1-hour meeting. For future meetings, maybe we can plan an agenda that's a little less ambitious. It's not always possible for some of us to extend the meeting even just a few minutes due to other obligations. Thanks.
Darcy
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 9:35 PM Steve Chan <steve.chan@icann.org> wrote:
Hello Team,
Below, please find the proposed agenda for the *PDP 3.0 Small Team Meeting on Monday 15 April at 13.00 UTC*
1. Welcome and roll call 2. Review of work plan 1. Understanding the format 2. Determining if changes should be made (e.g., to make it more achievable) 3. Review of topics from last meeting and agreement on next steps
1. #1. (Terms of participation for WG members): *Review EPDP Statement of Participation and consult with EPDP Team / leadership what impact, if any, the statement of participation has had.* *Is this complete?* 2. #14. (flexibility of PDP): *Develop draft set of criteria to evaluate request for data gathering and document this as a checklist to be used by a PDP WG.* *Is this complete?* 3. #13. (Review of Working Group Leadership): *Continue work of the SPS sub-group to make specific PDP 3.0 implementation recommendations.* *Discussion on next steps.* 1. Begin review of next topics:
1. #11. (Enforce deadlines and ensure bite size pieces): *Adapt fact sheet that is being used for EPDP Team to template so it can also be used for other efforts (staff is exploring possible integration with CRM / PM tools).* *Comments or suggestions on the draft?* 2. #9. Provide further guidance for sections 3.6 and clarification of section 3.7 (Appeal Process) (Standard Methodology for decision making): *Develop briefing document as well as slides to explain concept of “consensus” in the PDP.* *Discussion on the draft. Further changes needed before turning into a slide deck?* 3. #2. Consider alternatives to open WG model: *Prepare a comparison table for the proposed Working Group models, which could include several factors: membership eligibility, operating procedures, decision-making, communicating decision-making, urgency/timing (e.g., prioritization). Consider creating pros/cons as well. (Action item coming out of Council SPS 2019).* *Discussion on draft.* 1. AOB
If you have any questions or suggested changes, please let me know.
Best,
Steve
*Steven Chan*
Policy Director, GNSO Support
*ICANN*
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
Mobile: +1.310.339.4410
Office Telephone: +1.310.301.5800
Office Fax: +1.310.823.8649
Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses <https://learn.icann.org/> and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages <http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-e...> .
Follow @GNSO on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ICANN_GNSO
Follow the GNSO on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/icanngnso/
_______________________________________________ GNSO-PDP3Dot0-DT mailing list GNSO-PDP3Dot0-DT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-pdp3dot0-dt
_______________________________________________ GNSO-PDP3Dot0-DT mailing list GNSO-PDP3Dot0-DT@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-pdp3dot0-dt
participants (5)
-
Arsène Tungali -
Darcy Southwell -
Nathalie Peregrine -
Rafik Dammak -
Steve Chan