- Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg - lists.icann.org

Unsubscribe Please
by McDonald, Bruce April 15, 2020

April 15, 2020

Dear Colleagues, Regrettably I must ask you to unsubscribe me from all ICANN mailing lists. I had hoped to participate in these fascinating discussions but my ambitions exceeded my capabilities. Good luck and I hope to cross paths in the future. Sincerely, Bruce A. McDonald Attorney at Law p | 202-263-4362 f | 202-263-4372 e | bmcdonald(a)sgrlaw.com<mailto:bmcdonald@sgrlaw.com> 1055 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW | Suite 400 | Washington, DC 20007 www.sgrlaw.com<http://www.sgrlaw.com> | My Bio<http://www.sgrlaw.com/attorneys/bmcdonald/> | vCard<http://www.sgrlaw.com/attorneys/bmcdonald/?vcard> [cid:image37488a.JPG@57ab42ca.4ca9e339] <http://www.sgrlaw.com> ________________________________ Confidentiality Notice This message is being sent by or on behalf of a lawyer. It is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.

1 0

Remove, unsubscribe
by Denise Michel April 18, 2018

April 18, 2018

Please remove me from this group and unsubscribe me from this email list. Thanks Denise Michel Domain Name System Strategy & Management Facebook, Inc. denisemichel(a)fb.com<mailto:denisemichel@fb.com>

1 0

IRT Responses to Privacy/Proxy Operational Questions
by Amy Bivins Feb. 9, 2017

Feb. 9, 2017

Hello, All, Thanks so much to those of you who completed the operational questions survey. The attached file contains a complete list of questions and the answers we received. I plan to distribute a labeling requirements proposal for us to discuss on Tuesday's call no later than tomorrow. Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Policy Services Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins(a)icann.org www.icann.org

1 0

Agenda, materials for 29 November IRT call
by Amy Bivins Dec. 12, 2016

Dec. 12, 2016

Hi, All, I hope you are well! Our next Privacy and Proxy Service Provider Accreditation Program IRT call is scheduled for 29 November 2016, 14:00 UTC. I apologize, I misspoke in our last meeting about what time this meeting is in the U.S. (I said 10 Eastern, but that was before the time change. It is now 9 Eastern). We'll discuss briefly first thing on the call whether the IRT intended for the time to push later by an hour after the time change (or not). Our agenda is as follows: >Confirming regular call schedule >Call for additional expertise (we are looking for anyone with experience working with a privacy/proxy service provider that is not affiliated with an ICANN-accredited registrar, so that we can be sure that impacts on this business model are fully considered and understood as we are implementing this program) >Discussion topic 1: Draft Privacy and Proxy Service Provider Accreditation Policy Outline v1 >Discussion topic 2: Planning for IRT subgroups >(tentative) Discussion topic 3: ICANN operational planning (this might be pushed to the following meeting) >Next steps The first version of the draft policy outline that we will be discussing is attached. I will walk through it with you on our call and then request that you provide feedback on the document between the meeting on the 29th and the following IRT call, scheduled for 13 December. For those of you who are celebrating, I hope that you have a wonderful Thanksgiving holiday. I look forward to speaking with you all next week! Best, Amy Amy E. Bivins Registrar Policy Services Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins(a)icann.org www.icann.org

5 6

Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Reminder: Please Submit Feedback on Draft PP Policy Outline
by Amy Bivins Dec. 12, 2016

Dec. 12, 2016

Dear Neville, Thanks so much for your feedback (I’m copying the full IRT list so that everyone can see it). I hope you are able to make our call tomorrow, where we will be reviewing a slightly updated timeline (which takes into account the IRT’s bi-weekly meeting schedule and expected deliverables). In short, it appears likely that the first public comment period will be later in 2017 than originally projected, but we are projecting only a small shift in the anticipated program effective date (still in 1H 2019). I look forward to speaking with you all tomorrow. As a final reminder to all, please submit your input on the draft Policy outline to the list today if at all possible. Best, Amy From: Neville.Cordell(a)AllenOvery.com [mailto:Neville.Cordell@AllenOvery.com] Sent: Monday, December 12, 2016 1:05 PM To: Amy Bivins <amy.bivins(a)icann.org> Cc: Alex.Woolgar(a)allenovery.com Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Gdd-gnso-ppsai-impl] Reminder: Please Submit Feedback on Draft PP Policy Outline Dear Amy, By way of introduction, I am a nominated representative from the INTA P&P Accreditation working group on the ICANN IRT. I believe that you are aware that although I requested to join the IRT mailing list before the project kick-off, I was not actually added to the mailing list until recently. Having now been back through the documents I missed, I wanted to ensure that you have to hand INTA’s views on the 14 October 2016 implementation plan/framework, in the hope that these will still be taken into account. My main comment is I know that you have received a number of comments from registrars which suggested that the timetable as originally proposed was too “punchy”. As far as INTA is concerned, we think the timetable as proposed was appropriate and realistic, and if anything could be even tighter. We do think that it is important that the schedule does not slip too much – we all know that a great deal of time and effort has been devoted to getting to this point and it is important not to lose momentum. We know that, as far as rights holders are concerned, the sooner the new P&P Accreditation Program can be implemented in line with the Final Recommendations, the better. Thank you in advance for your accommodation in taking on board INTA’s views! Kind regards, Neville Neville Cordell | Partner | International IP Group Allen & Overy LLP One Bishops Square | London | E1 6AD | United Kingdom Direct +44 20 3088 2754 | Mobile +44 7827 302 249 | Tel +44 20 3088 0000 | Fax +44 20 3088 0088 www.allenovery.com[allenovery.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.allenovery.com_&d=D…> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.chambersandpartners…> Ranked Tier 1 for Global Dispute Resolution[chambersandpartners.com]: Chambers Global 2015 Global Litigation Survey "taster" brochure - new and expanded edition, March 2015[aohub.com] Annual Review 2015[allenovery.mdewth.lv] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__allenovery.mdewth.lv_&d…> – Convergence & Disruption _____ This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it and notify us immediately by telephoning or e-mailing the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person. Allen & Overy LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales with registered number OC306763. Allen & Overy (Holdings) Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales with registered number 07462870. The term partner is used to refer to a member of Allen & Overy LLP or a director of Allen & Overy (Holdings) Limited or in either case an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of the members of Allen & Overy LLP and of the non-members who are designated as partners, and a list of the directors of Allen & Overy (Holdings) Limited, are open to inspection at the registered office of both, One Bishops Square, London E1 6AD. Both Allen & Overy LLP and Allen & Overy (Holdings) Limited are authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales. For further information about how we are regulated, including with regard to our complaints procedure, insurance mediation and other financial services, please see our website at http://www.allenovery.com/aoweb/legal[allenovery.com] <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.allenovery.com_aowe…> . _____

1 0

Thank you for your initial feedback!
by Amy Bivins Oct. 31, 2016

Oct. 31, 2016

Hello everyone, Thank you to those who provided initial feedback on the v1 proposed implementation framework. Please continue to discuss this proposal among your colleagues at ICANN57, and provide any additional feedback during our working meeting toward the end of the week (the working meeting is on Wednesday). Particularly consider whether you think this overall approach (the contract-based model) fulfils the intent of the PDP recommendations. If the IRT agrees with staff that this is the approach the PDP WG intended, we will move ahead with this approach starting at our next meeting, which will be scheduled for the week of 28 November. You should have received an invitation to the working meeting and the overview session. If you won't be in Hyderabad, there will be remote participation available. This will be especially important for the working meeting-we hope to have a successful, substantive discussion on the proposal and proposed timeline there. Also, this is my final ask-if anyone would be willing to provide some comments on the staff framework proposal during the overview session on Friday, at 11am local time, please let me know. The more community perspective/feedback we have, the better. Safe travels to those who are attending ICANN57, and I look forward to meeting with you there! Amy E. Bivins Registrar Policy Services Manager Registrar Services and Industry Relations Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct: +1 (202) 249-7551 Fax: +1 (202) 789-0104 Email: amy.bivins(a)icann.org www.icann.org

1 0

Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] IRT call for participation
by Sara Bockey Sept. 19, 2016

Sept. 19, 2016

Please add me to the IRT as well. Thanks, sara bockey policy manager | GoDaddy™ sbockey(a)godaddy.com 480-366-3616 skype: sbockey This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this message and its attachments. From: <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces(a)icann.org> on behalf of Michelle DeSmyter <michelle.desmyter(a)icann.org> Date: Friday, September 16, 2016 at 2:19 PM To: "Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg(a)icann.org" <Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg(a)icann.org> Cc: "gnso-secs(a)icann.org" <gnso-secs(a)icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] IRT call for participation Call for participation - Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues Policy Development Process (PDP) Implementation Review Team (IRT) On 9 August 2016, the ICANN Board of Directors adopted<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-08-09-en#2.e> the recommendations of the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group as listed in its Final Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/raa/ppsai-final-07dec15-en.pdf>. Staff from the Global Domains Division (GDD)—responsible for leading the implementation of the policy recommendations—is hereby issuing a call for volunteers to form an Implementation Review Team (IRT) to work with staff to implement the policy recommendations adopted by the Board. This call for IRT volunteers is for the attention of the members of the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP Working Group at a minimum. However, other members of the community who did not participate on the IRT are also invited to the IRT. The key responsibilities of the IRT are as follows: Work with ICANN staff to ensure that the implementation fulfills the original intentions of the adopted policy recommendations Review the proposed implementation work plan, as drafted by staff, for the recommendations as adopted by the Board Assist in case questions regarding the PDP or a need for clarification arises in relation to the adopted recommendations Advise on technical and operational details related to the implementation of the adopted recommendations Familiarity with the policy recommendations as well as the deliberations that informed those recommendations is a minimum requirement for IRT members. IRT volunteers should be able to attend regularly scheduled IRT meetings for the duration of this project. Staff currently anticipates that this implementation project could take up to 18-24 months to complete. All volunteers responding to this call will be expected to understand the role and remit of the IRT for the implementation project. If, in the course of implementation, the IRT identifies a need for potential modifications to the policy recommendations, the team must refer these to the GNSO Council for its consideration and additional guidance. How to Apply If you are interested in participating, please send an email to the GNSO Secretariat via gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> no later than 30 September 2016, 11:59 UTC. Background The Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) is the contract that governs the relationship between ICANN and its accredited registrars (a directory of accredited registrars can be found at http://www.internic.net/regist.html) The RAA also may have impacts on registrants and other third parties involved in the domain name system. In initiating negotiations for the 2013 RAA between ICANN and the Registrars Stakeholder Group in October 2011, the ICANN Board had also requested an Issue Report from the GNSO that would start a GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) to address remaining issues not dealt with in the RAA negotiations and that would be suited to a PDP (the Board's Resolution can be found at http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-28oct11-en.htm#7) In June 2013, the ICANN Board approved a new 2013 RAA (the provisions of which can be found at http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/approved-with-specs-27jun1…) and this PDP was launched in October 2013. The Final Recommendations of the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP Working Group, which GDD is now preparing to implement, are the consensus outcomes of that PDP. Once implemented, this Privacy and Proxy Services accreditation program will supersede requirements in the 2013 RAA’s Specification on Privacy and Proxy Registrations<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/approved-with-specs-27jun…>. Kind regards, Michelle DeSmyter

3 2

IRT call for participation
by Michelle DeSmyter Sept. 17, 2016

Sept. 17, 2016

Call for participation - Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues Policy Development Process (PDP) Implementation Review Team (IRT) On 9 August 2016, the ICANN Board of Directors adopted<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-08-09-en#2.e> the recommendations of the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues Policy Development Process (PDP) Working Group as listed in its Final Report<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/raa/ppsai-final-07dec15-en.pdf>. Staff from the Global Domains Division (GDD)-responsible for leading the implementation of the policy recommendations-is hereby issuing a call for volunteers to form an Implementation Review Team (IRT) to work with staff to implement the policy recommendations adopted by the Board. This call for IRT volunteers is for the attention of the members of the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP Working Group at a minimum. However, other members of the community who did not participate on the IRT are also invited to the IRT. The key responsibilities of the IRT are as follows: ? Work with ICANN staff to ensure that the implementation fulfills the original intentions of the adopted policy recommendations ? Review the proposed implementation work plan, as drafted by staff, for the recommendations as adopted by the Board ? Assist in case questions regarding the PDP or a need for clarification arises in relation to the adopted recommendations ? Advise on technical and operational details related to the implementation of the adopted recommendations Familiarity with the policy recommendations as well as the deliberations that informed those recommendations is a minimum requirement for IRT members. IRT volunteers should be able to attend regularly scheduled IRT meetings for the duration of this project. Staff currently anticipates that this implementation project could take up to 18-24 months to complete. All volunteers responding to this call will be expected to understand the role and remit of the IRT for the implementation project. If, in the course of implementation, the IRT identifies a need for potential modifications to the policy recommendations, the team must refer these to the GNSO Council for its consideration and additional guidance. How to Apply If you are interested in participating, please send an email to the GNSO Secretariat via gnso-secs(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org> no later than 30 September 2016, 11:59 UTC. Background The Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA) is the contract that governs the relationship between ICANN and its accredited registrars (a directory of accredited registrars can be found at http://www.internic.net/regist.html) The RAA also may have impacts on registrants and other third parties involved in the domain name system. In initiating negotiations for the 2013 RAA between ICANN and the Registrars Stakeholder Group in October 2011, the ICANN Board had also requested an Issue Report from the GNSO that would start a GNSO Policy Development Process (PDP) to address remaining issues not dealt with in the RAA negotiations and that would be suited to a PDP (the Board's Resolution can be found at http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-28oct11-en.htm#7) In June 2013, the ICANN Board approved a new 2013 RAA (the provisions of which can be found at http://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/approved-with-specs-27jun1…) and this PDP was launched in October 2013. The Final Recommendations of the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP Working Group, which GDD is now preparing to implement, are the consensus outcomes of that PDP. Once implemented, this Privacy and Proxy Services accreditation program will supersede requirements in the 2013 RAA's Specification on Privacy and Proxy Registrations<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/approved-with-specs-27jun…>. Kind regards, Michelle DeSmyter

8 7

ICANN Board Resolution
by Michele Neylon - Blacknight Aug. 12, 2016

Aug. 12, 2016

e. GNSO Policy Recommendations on Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Whereas, on 31 October 2013, the GNSO Council approved the charter for a Working Group to conduct a Policy Development Process that had been requested by the ICANN Board concerning the accreditation by ICANN of privacy and proxy domain name registration service providers, as further described at http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/raa-pp-charter-22oct13-en.pdf [PDF, 463 KB]. Whereas, the PDP followed the prescribed PDP steps as stated in the ICANN Bylaws, resulting in a Final Report being delivered to the GNSO Council on 8 December 2015. Whereas, the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP Working Group (WG) reached Full Consensus on all its final recommendations (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/raa/ppsai-final-07dec15-en.pdf [PDF, 1.24 MB]). Whereas, the GNSO Council reviewed and discussed the final recommendations of the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP WG, and adopted the recommendations on 21 January 2016 by a unanimous vote (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions - 201601.) Whereas, the GNSO Council vote exceeded the required voting threshold (i.e. supermajority) to impose new obligations on ICANN contracted parties. Whereas, in accordance with the ICANN Bylaws, a public comment period was opened on the approved recommendations to provide the community with a reasonable opportunity to comment on their adoption prior to action by the ICANN Board, and the comments received have been summarized and reported (see https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-ppsai-recommend… [PDF, 299 KB]). Whereas, the ICANN Bylaws provide that the Board is to request the GAC's opinion regarding "any policies that are being considered by the Board for adoption that substantially affect the operation of the Internet or third parties, including the imposition of any fees or charges" and "take duly into account any advice timely presented" as a result. Whereas, the Board notified the GAC of the publication of the GNSO's final recommendations for public comment on 19 February 2016 (see https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27492514/2016-02-19-Steve-Cro… [PDF, 819 KB]). Whereas, in its Marrakech Communiqué issued on 9 March 2016 the GAC advised the ICANN Board that it needed more time to consider potential public policy concerns relating to the adoption of the final PDP recommendations (see https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/28278854/GAC Morocco 55 Communique FINAL.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1458046221000&api=v2 [PDF, 567 KB]). Whereas, on 15 May 2016 the Board acknowledged receipt of the GNSO's PDP recommendations and resolved to consider them at its first meeting following ICANN56 to enable the GAC to provide timely advice, if any (see https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en - 2.a). Whereas, in its Helsinki Communiqué issued on 30 June 2016 the GAC advised the ICANN Board to direct that the GAC's concerns be effectively addressed to the greatest extent feasible by the Implementation Review Team that is to be convened to implement the adopted recommendations (see https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/Governmental+Advisory+Committee?pre… [PDF, 328 KB]). Resolved (2016.08.09.08), the Board hereby adopts all the final recommendations of the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP Working Group, as passed by a unanimous vote of the GNSO Council on 21 January 2016 ("Privacy/Proxy Policy Recommendations"). Resolved (2016.08.09.09), the Board directs the President and CEO, or his authorized designee, to develop and execute an implementation plan, including costs and timelines, for the Privacy/Proxy Policy Recommendations consistent with ICANN Bylaws Annex A and the Implementation Review Team Guidelines & Principles endorsed by the Board on 28 September 2015 (see https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2015-09-28-en - 2.f), and to continue communication with the community on such work. In the event that policy issues arise in the course of implementation discussions, they should be referred back to the GNSO in accordance with the framework for implementation associated with GNSO policy recommendations, including the Implementation Review Team Guidelines & Principles. Resolved (2016.08.09.10), the Board acknowledges the GAC's advice from the Helsinki Communiqué regarding the Privacy/Proxy Policy Recommendations. The Board will consider the GAC's advice and provide input to the Implementation Review Team for consideration in implementation planning. -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains http://www.blacknight.host/ http://blog.blacknight.com/ http://ceo.hosting/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845

2 1

Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] ICANN Board Resolution
by James M. Bladel Aug. 12, 2016

Aug. 12, 2016

Congratulations, everyone! And now it¹s on to implantationŠsee you on the IRT! Thanks‹ J. On 8/12/16, 6:20 , "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces(a)icann.org on behalf of Michele Neylon - Blacknight" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces(a)icann.org on behalf of michele(a)blacknight.com> wrote: >e. GNSO Policy Recommendations on Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation > >Whereas, on 31 October 2013, the GNSO Council approved the charter for a >Working Group to conduct a Policy Development Process that had been >requested by the ICANN Board concerning the accreditation by ICANN of >privacy and proxy domain name registration service providers, as further >described at >http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/raa-pp-charter-22oct13-en.pdf [PDF, 463 >KB]. > >Whereas, the PDP followed the prescribed PDP steps as stated in the ICANN >Bylaws, resulting in a Final Report being delivered to the GNSO Council >on 8 December 2015. > >Whereas, the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP Working >Group (WG) reached Full Consensus on all its final recommendations (see >http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/raa/ppsai-final-07dec15-en.pdf [PDF, 1.24 >MB]). > >Whereas, the GNSO Council reviewed and discussed the final >recommendations of the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP >WG, and adopted the recommendations on 21 January 2016 by a unanimous >vote (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions - 201601.) > >Whereas, the GNSO Council vote exceeded the required voting threshold >(i.e. supermajority) to impose new obligations on ICANN contracted >parties. > >Whereas, in accordance with the ICANN Bylaws, a public comment period was >opened on the approved recommendations to provide the community with a >reasonable opportunity to comment on their adoption prior to action by >the ICANN Board, and the comments received have been summarized and >reported (see >https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/report-comments-ppsai-recommen >dations-31mar16-en.pdf [PDF, 299 KB]). > >Whereas, the ICANN Bylaws provide that the Board is to request the GAC's >opinion regarding "any policies that are being considered by the Board >for adoption that substantially affect the operation of the Internet or >third parties, including the imposition of any fees or charges" and "take >duly into account any advice timely presented" as a result. > >Whereas, the Board notified the GAC of the publication of the GNSO's >final recommendations for public comment on 19 February 2016 (see >https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/27492514/2016-02-19-Steve-Cr >ocker-to-Thomas-Schneider-GNSO-PDP.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=14560469 >42000&api=v2 [PDF, 819 KB]). > >Whereas, in its Marrakech Communiqué issued on 9 March 2016 the GAC >advised the ICANN Board that it needed more time to consider potential >public policy concerns relating to the adoption of the final PDP >recommendations (see >https://gacweb.icann.org/download/attachments/28278854/GAC Morocco 55 >Communique FINAL.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1458046221000&api=v2 >[PDF, 567 KB]). > >Whereas, on 15 May 2016 the Board acknowledged receipt of the GNSO's PDP >recommendations and resolved to consider them at its first meeting >following ICANN56 to enable the GAC to provide timely advice, if any (see >https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2016-05-15-en >- 2.a). > >Whereas, in its Helsinki Communiqué issued on 30 June 2016 the GAC >advised the ICANN Board to direct that the GAC's concerns be effectively >addressed to the greatest extent feasible by the Implementation Review >Team that is to be convened to implement the adopted recommendations (see >https://gacweb.icann.org/display/gacweb/Governmental+Advisory+Committee?pr >eview=/27132037/43712639/20160630_GAC%20ICANN%2056%20Communique_FINAL%20.p >df [PDF, 328 KB]). > >Resolved (2016.08.09.08), the Board hereby adopts all the final >recommendations of the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP >Working Group, as passed by a unanimous vote of the GNSO Council on 21 >January 2016 ("Privacy/Proxy Policy Recommendations"). > >Resolved (2016.08.09.09), the Board directs the President and CEO, or his >authorized designee, to develop and execute an implementation plan, >including costs and timelines, for the Privacy/Proxy Policy >Recommendations consistent with ICANN Bylaws Annex A and the >Implementation Review Team Guidelines & Principles endorsed by the Board >on 28 September 2015 (see >https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2015-09-28-en >- 2.f), and to continue communication with the community on such work. In >the event that policy issues arise in the course of implementation >discussions, they should be referred back to the GNSO in accordance with >the framework for implementation associated with GNSO policy >recommendations, including the Implementation Review Team Guidelines & >Principles. > >Resolved (2016.08.09.10), the Board acknowledges the GAC's advice from >the Helsinki Communiqué regarding the Privacy/Proxy Policy >Recommendations. The Board will consider the GAC's advice and provide >input to the Implementation Review Team for consideration in >implementation planning. > > >-- >Mr Michele Neylon >Blacknight Solutions >Hosting, Colocation & Domains >http://www.blacknight.host/ >http://blog.blacknight.com/ >http://ceo.hosting/ >Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 >Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 >------------------------------- >Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business >Park,Sleaty >Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845 > >_______________________________________________ >Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list >Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg(a)icann.org >https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

1 0