+1
I would second this proposal.
Stephanie
On 15-04-21 11:07 AM, Kathy Kleiman wrote:
> Hi All,
> As we work to close the document, I would like to point out another
> change that was proposed, but not discussed or accepted. It's the
> deletion of the words
> "but not limited to" in the opening of III.C. This was proposed by
> Val, not discussed on our call, and not accepted by the group. I would
> like to ask that the initial words ("including but not limited to"),
> in the draft for so long, be continued... as they are standard
> drafting language --- and do not limit the broad sets of responses so
> many supported today.
>
> Best,
> Kathy
>
> III.C. Disclosure can be reasonably refused, for reasons consistent
> with the general policy stated herein, including, but not limited to
> any of the following: ***
> _______________________________________________
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
> Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg