Don ,

Should we consider some kind of dispute resolution system for conflicts and rules for avoiding or punishing those parties that try to game the system?

Hector

Héctor Ariel Manoff

Vitale, Manoff & Feilbogen

Viamonte 1145 10º Piso

C1053ABW Buenos Aires

República Argentina

Te: (54-11) 4371-6100

Fax: (54-11) 4371-6365

E-mail: amanoff@vmf.com.ar

Web: http://www.vmf.com.ar

De: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Don Blumenthal
Enviado el: jueves, 23 de enero de 2014 17:46
Para: PPSAI
Asunto: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Latest Questions Groupings Document

Good afternoon,

We have done some more tweaking over the last couple of days. We tried to incorporate all suggestions that we received or heard on calls. However, some specific points were left out because they struck us as redundant. Don’t hesitate to say “put it back because it meant something else in a different group.”

The document still needs work: substance, organization, specific language, typos, and more. However, we are pushing it out now so that WG members have time to examine, comment, and edit. As I wrote before, the list will be a fluid document as we continue our work.

I’ll add a high level note. Our basic mission is to develop an accreditation system for p/p providers. Some might even argue that anything more is beyond our remit. Taking an expansive view, rules for use of p/p, or a determination that there should be no restrictions, will be part of developing the accreditation system. On the other hand, that p/p will continue strikes me as having been established by ICANN.

I look forward to continuing our work.

Regards,

Don