Don and all,

As we suggested earlier, and discussed in the last Group teleconference, it might be helpful, as a next step, if we reached a consensus on the groups of questions before sending them out to SO/ACs and SG/Cs.   

This would involve two steps: First, agreeing on the name of each group; and second, streamlining the questions in each group. 

In the first step, we could consider alternative headings (perhaps REGISTRATION instead of MAINTENANCE).

And in the second step, we could remove duplicative or vague questions.

This crystallization would make the questions more approachable, and encourage better responses. 

I hope these ideas are helpful.

Best,

Jim

James L. Bikoff

Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP

1101 30th Street, NW

Suite 120

Washington, DC 20007

Tel: 202-944-3303

Fax: 202-944-3306

jbikoff@sgbdc.com

From: Don Blumenthal <dblumenthal@pir.org>
Date: January 14, 2014 11:09:23 AM EST
To: PPSAI <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Carlton's closing chat question

Carlton posted an issue that shouldn’t wait a week:

“John came up with 4 groups. Do we have a notion that others might be extracted?  And where do we include/modify questions to address Stephanie's issue?"

Jim had four groups and an umbrella Main category, which may be instructive in itself in guiding how we proceed organizationally. Regardless, the consensus of commenters has been that his document is a significant improvement over where we were before, and I suggest that we use it as a baseline. However, we still have work to do on it. Feel free to suggest modifications. 

Don

_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg