The WG recommends
that the requirements in relation to which forms of alleged malicious conduct
would be covered by the designated published point of contact at an
ICANN-accredited privacy/proxy service provider include an indicative list of
forms of malicious conduct that would need to be covered while at the same time
these requirements should allow for enough flexibility to accommodate new
types of malicious conduct being covered. Section 3 of the Public Interest Commitments (PIC)
Specification in the New gTLD Registry Agreement[1] or
Safeguard 2, Annex 1 of the GAC’s Beijing Communique[2] could
serve as examples for how this could be achieved.
[1] Registry Operator will include a provision
in its Registry-Registrar Agreement that requires Registrars to include in
their Registration Agreements a provision prohibiting Registered Name Holders
from distributing malware, abusively operating botnets, phishing, piracy,
trademark or copyright infringement, fraudulent or deceptive practices,
counterfeiting or otherwise engaging in activity contrary to applicable law,
and providing (consistent with applicable law and any related procedures)
consequences for such activities including suspension of the domain name.
[2] Registry Operator will include a provision
in its Registry-Registrar Agreement that requires Registrars to include in
their Registration Agreements a provision prohibiting Registered Name Holders
from distributing malware, abusively operating botnets, phishing, piracy,
trademark or copyright infringement, fraudulent or deceptive practices,
counterfeiting or otherwise engaging in activity contrary to applicable law,
and providing (consistent with applicable law and any related procedures)
consequences for such activities including suspension of the domain name.
===================
You are encouraged to share any comments / edits you may have with the mailing list.
Best regards,
Marika