Personally I think two things:

1 – P/P services should be open to anyone who wants to use them

2 – the display in whois should be the same no matter who or what has registered the domain

With respect to point 2, I don’t have any issue with there being a “flag” of some kind to indicate that a registration record is using an accredited P/P

Regards

Michele

Mr Michele Neylon

Blacknight Solutions

Hosting & Colocation, Domains

http://www.blacknight.co/

http://blog.blacknight.com/

http://www.technology.ie

Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072

Locall: 1850 929 929

Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090

Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763

Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon

-------------------------------

Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty

Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland Company No.: 370845

From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Metalitz, Steven
Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 5:07 PM
To: 'Marika Konings'; gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] PPSAI WG -- questions for list

Thanks to all participants on today’s call. Following up on requests made on the call ----

Regarding Don’s draft preliminary text regarding questions C(threshold), C 1 and C2, please circulate your comments and (especially welcomed!) proposed edits. Don’s draft is re-attached here for ready reference.

Regarding question C.3: If the following applies to you, please respond on the list:

IF you believe that privacy/proxy services ought to be open to commercial entities under some circumstances, THEN should there be a difference in the data displayed for such registrations (vs. what is displayed for p/p registrations by natural persons)? If the answer is YES, please specify the differences.

For myself I will say that my answer is NO, but I hope that any YES people will step forward on the list.

Thanks!

Steve Metalitz, vice chair

From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2014 3:39 PM
To: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Proposed Agenda - PPSAI WG Meeting

Dear All,

Please find below the proposed agenda for tomorrow's PPSAI WG Meeting.

Best regards,

Marika

Proposed Agenda – PPSAI WG Meeting – 20 May 2014

Roll Call / SOI
Review proposed preliminary conclusion for threshold question, C1 and C2 (as circulated by Don)
Review C3 – is additional response/discussion needed in light of item 2? (see template attached)
Continue deliberations on D1 (see updated template attached)
Next steps / confirm next meeting