Please find below the notes and “action items” (including suggested deadlines) arising from the WG call of earlier today.
(1) Proposed text for an updated Section 1.3.2 (based on work of Sub Team 1):
- Please review and bring up any concerns about inaccuracies (i.e. In reflecting Sub Team 1’s recommendations and/or the WG’s conclusions) and suggested edits to the WG mailing list by Friday 25 September
(2) Proposed text for an updated Section 1.3.3 (based on work of Sub Team 2):
- Need to clarify that para 1 on pg 1 refers to the WG status (no consensus) at the time the Initial Report was published (i.e. background to the Final Report text)
- Pg 2: Need to clarify language to more clearly state that the WG recognizes that some providers currently have restrictions, and the WG is not recommending that making the distinction be made an accreditation standard/requirement
- Pg 2 para 1: Change "deny" to “differentiate”, and check on WG usage of “online financial transactions” (as opposed to “commercial” vs. “non-commercial”)
- Pg 2: Drop the last two paragraphs of the document due to lack of support
- Please send any additional comments (besides the ones discussed today and resolved as summarized above) to the WG mailing list by Friday 25 September
(3) Next steps for Sub Team 3:
- Bring back recommendations or alternative proposals (especially on the question of what would be sufficient for "verifiable evidence”) to the WG for discussion on the call next week
(4) Next steps for Sub Team 4:
- Summary and updated report to be presented on the WG call next week
(5) Next steps on Issue Spotting (Parts 1, 2, 3 of WG Public Comment Review Tool):
- WG members to review current list and note on WG mailing which (if any) might result in the WG having to change one or more of its Preliminary Recommendations; such issues as well as operational concerns raised by GDD/Compliance (if relevant) to be discussed at a subsequent WG meeting