Hello everyone,

Just to confirm that this was indeed reinstated and is reflected as a bracketed option in the 23 April draft Initial Report, as part of Annex E (i.e. the illustrative disclosure framework).

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong@icann.org



From: Holly Raiche <h.raiche@internode.on.net>
Date: Monday, April 27, 2015 at 17:29
To: Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca>
Cc: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] III.C words "but not limited to" need to go back in too

Agree with Kathy  and Stephanie on this

Holly
On 28 Apr 2015, at 6:28 am, Stephanie Perrin <stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:

I would second this suggestion.
Stephanie Perrin
PS I am travelling and may experience some difficulties connecting on today's call.

On 2015-04-22 4:56, Darcy Southwell wrote:
I agree with Kathy.

I don’t recall that we came to an agreement on this specific language removal (although I believe it was discussed at some point).  Without consensus, we should not remove the language at this point.

That aside, in order to create a sustainable  accreditation program, we should include the “but not limited to” language to ensure that P/P providers can address concerns based in local law without being in violation of the accreditation agreement.

Thanks,
Darcy

From: Kathy Kleiman <kathy@kathykleiman.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 8:07 AM
To: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org>
Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] III.C words "but not limited to" need to go back in too

Hi All,
As we work to close the document, I would like to point out another
change that was proposed, but not discussed or accepted. It's the
deletion of the words
"but not limited to" in the opening of III.C.  This was proposed by Val,
not discussed on our call, and not accepted by the group. I would like
to ask that the initial words ("including but not limited to"), in the
draft for so long, be continued... as they are standard drafting
language --- and do not limit the broad sets of responses so many
supported today.

Best,
Kathy

III.C. Disclosure can be reasonably refused, for reasons consistent with
the general policy stated herein, including, but not limited to any of
the following: ***
_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list



_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg

_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list
Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg