Proposed agenda for WG meeting on 18 March (Re: For your review - template Category B - question 3)
Dear all, Further to Marika's message and attachment (below), here is the proposed agenda for the WG call on 18 March at 1500 UTC (again, for WG members in North America, please note the correct time given the recent changeover from daylight savings time): 1. Roll Call/Update to SOIs 2. Finalize template for Category B Question 2 (updated as of 17 March to include all SG/C feedback received so far attached) 3. Commence discussions on Category B Question 3 (initial template forwarded earlier by Marika) 4. Next Steps/Next Meeting The WG wiki has also been updated with these documents: https://community.icann.org/x/oR3RAg Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@icann.org * One World. One Internet. * From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Monday, March 17, 2014 6:40 PM To: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] For your review - template Category B - question 3
Dear All,
In preparation for our meeting tomorrow, please find attached the proposed template for Category B question 3 (What rights and responsibilities should domain name registrants that use privacy/proxy services have? What obligations should ICANN-accredited privacy/proxy service providers have in managing these rights and responsibilities? Clarify how transfers, renewals, and PEDNR policies should apply.) If there is any additional information that should be added to the background section, please let me know.
In relation to transfers, renewals and PEDNR policies, we've started to develop a list of questions that the WG may need to consider in relation to these policies. If there are any additional questions that should be included, please feel free to suggest. We are hoping that some of the registrar members will be able to shed a light on how these issues are currently handled and whether or not these need to be factored into the WG recommendations. * Per the ERRP, 'registrars must notify the registered name holder of the expiration at least two times'. Should there be a requirement for the P/P provider to pass these notices on to the P/P customer? * Per the ERRP, 'if a registration is not renewed by the RAE or deleted by the registrar, within five days after the expiration of the registration, the registrar must transmit at least one additional expiration notice to the RAE that includes instructions for renewing the registration'. Should there be a requirement for the P/P provider to pass these notices on to the P/P customer? * Per the ERRP, 'beginning at the time of expiration and through the DNS resolution interruption period described in paragraphs 2.2.2 and 2.2.3, the RAE must be permitted by the registrar to renew the expired registration'. What if the underlying customer wants to renew the registration? Idem for restoration during the Redemption Grace Period. * In relation to the IRTP, should there be any restrictions concerning transfers of P/P registrations? (e.g. some of the terms and conditions require the P/P services to be removed during the transfer process). Depending on the response to this question, all communications in the IRTP currently go via the transfer contact (Registered Name Holder / Admin Contact). Should there be any requirements for this information to also be communicated to the P/P customer? What happens if there is a disagreement relating to the transfer between the P/P provider and the P/P customer? Best regards,
Marika
Dear All: I will miss this call; enroute to SIN. Please tender my apologies. Kind regards, -Carlton ============================== Carlton A Samuels Mobile: 876-818-1799 *Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround* ============================= On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org> wrote:
Dear all,
Further to Marika's message and attachment (below), here is the proposed agenda for the WG call on 18 March at 1500 UTC (again, for WG members in North America, please note the correct time given the recent changeover from daylight savings time):
1. Roll Call/Update to SOIs 2. Finalize template for Category B Question 2 (updated as of 17 March to include all SG/C feedback received so far - attached) 3. Commence discussions on Category B Question 3 (initial template forwarded earlier by Marika) 4. Next Steps/Next Meeting
The WG wiki has also been updated with these documents: https://community.icann.org/x/oR3RAg
Thanks and cheers Mary
Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@icann.org
* One World. One Internet. *
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@icann.org> Date: Monday, March 17, 2014 6:40 PM To: "gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] For your review - template Category B - question 3
Dear All,
In preparation for our meeting tomorrow, please find attached the proposed template for Category B - question 3 (*What rights and responsibilities should domain name registrants that use privacy/proxy services have? What obligations should ICANN-accredited privacy/proxy service providers have in managing these rights and responsibilities? Clarify how transfers, renewals, and PEDNR policies should apply.) *If there is any additional information that should be added to the background section, please let me know.
In relation to transfers, renewals and PEDNR policies, we've started to develop a list of questions that the WG may need to consider in relation to these policies. If there are any additional questions that should be included, please feel free to suggest. We are hoping that some of the registrar members will be able to shed a light on how these issues are currently handled and whether or not these need to be factored into the WG recommendations.
- Per the ERRP, 'registrars must notify the registered name holder of the expiration at least two times'. Should there be a requirement for the P/P provider to pass these notices on to the P/P customer? - Per the ERRP, 'if a registration is not renewed by the RAE or deleted by the registrar, within five days after the expiration of the registration, the registrar must transmit at least one additional expiration notice to the RAE that includes instructions for renewing the registration'. Should there be a requirement for the P/P provider to pass these notices on to the P/P customer? - Per the ERRP, 'beginning at the time of expiration and through the DNS resolution interruption period described in paragraphs 2.2.2 and 2.2.3, the RAE must be permitted by the registrar to renew the expired registration'. What if the underlying customer wants to renew the registration? Idem for restoration during the Redemption Grace Period. - In relation to the IRTP, should there be any restrictions concerning transfers of P/P registrations? (e.g. some of the terms and conditions require the P/P services to be removed during the transfer process). Depending on the response to this question, all communications in the IRTP currently go via the transfer contact (Registered Name Holder / Admin Contact). Should there be any requirements for this information to also be communicated to the P/P customer? What happens if there is a disagreement relating to the transfer between the P/P provider and the P/P customer?
Best regards,
Marika
_______________________________________________ Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg mailing list Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg@icann.org https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg
participants (2)
-
Carlton Samuels -
Mary Wong