Hi Mary, Thanks for this. My top two choices are (2) "Further discussion on Category E - Relay, and (3) Further discussion on Category F - Reveal. I note at the top of the proposed agenda that you are asking us to agree not to have phones or laptops on during the meeting. This is unacceptable. It restricts our ability to communicate with remote participants and is frankly a little paternalistic. Many of us use our laptops to communicate with colleagues who are not present at the meeting in order to collaborate on appropriate responses to the information being presented. In addition, there are many special circumstances that may require someone to remain connected to the internet and to their cell phone (through voice or text). For example, I will have my three month old daughter at the meeting and will have to communicate with her caretaker via text. Please remove this requirement. If someone isn't paying attention, that's on them. Thanks, Kiran Kiran Malancharuvil Policy Counselor MarkMonitor kiranm@markmonitor.com<mailto:kiranm@markmonitor.com> 415-222-8318 (t) 415-419-9138 (m) ________________________________ From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] on behalf of Mary Wong [mary.wong@icann.org] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 11:42 AM To: PPSAI WG Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Please select TWO topics from this list for the WG F2F session on 10 Oct 2014 Dear WG members, After consultation with the WG chairs, we would like to propose the following as topics that we thought would benefit from further and more in-depth discussion during the WG’s upcoming face-to-face facilitated session in Los Angeles on Friday 10 October. Please reply (off list to me is fine) with your top two choices of preferred topics – note that the last option also allows anyone to add a topic (based on the group’s Preliminary Conclusions and templates to date, and following the Charter questions and agreed categories A-G) that is not specifically listed below. Staff will compile a list of the top three topics selected by the most WG members for discussion at the 10 October session. 1. What rights/responsibilities and obligations should be communicated by P/P service providers to customers/registrants with regard to transfers and renewals of domain name registrations? (from Category B Question 3 – see attached report from the Transfers Issues sub-team (James and Kathy); the WG Template including Preliminary Conclusions can be reviewed at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg) 2. Further discussion on Category E – Relay (see WG Templates including Preliminary Conclusions at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg; specifically, the three remaining “open questions”, i.e.: (a) Should providers be required to forward hard copy notices to registrants/customers, on request, in cases where electronic communications are known to be undeliverable? (b) Should providers be permitted to charge a reasonable fee to forward non-electronic communications that incur a cost to do so (this could include monetary costs such as charges for registered mail and/or other resource costs such as man-hours to review/strip out personal information from a communication)? (c) If a provider chooses not to forward an allegation of illegal activity, should there be an obligation for a provider to inform a requestor when the provider does not forward its request? 3. Further discussion on Category F– Reveal (specific questions TBD depending on extent of WG discussions between now and 10 October; see draft WG Templates and current Preliminary Conclusions at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg) 4. What aspects of the current temporary P/P specification in the 2013 RAA should be retained and/or expanded for the accreditation program? What is not in the current specification but should be? (See https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-2013-09-17-en#priv...) 5. What are the business practices that a P/P provider should disclose to potential and actual customers, as part of the accreditation program? 6. Any other suggestions not already on this list? We attach also a suggested proposed agenda for the day – including proposed “ground rules” that have been found to have been extremely useful for focusing discussions – and a document on Collaborative Reminders prepared by our professional facilitators that similarly are intended to facilitate useful constructive discussion and outcomes based on the objectives of our session. On behalf of the WG chairs, we look forward to your feedback on the topics for our LA discussion. Please indicate your choices as soon as possible and in any event by this Friday 3 October. Thank you! Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@icann.org

Mary, we favor topics 2 and 3. Jim James L. Bikoff Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP 1101 30th Street, NW Suite 120 Washington, DC 20007 Tel: 202-944-3303 Fax: 202-944-3306 jbikoff@sgbdc.com<mailto:jbikoff@sgbdc.com> From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:42 PM To: PPSAI WG Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Please select TWO topics from this list for the WG F2F session on 10 Oct 2014 Dear WG members, After consultation with the WG chairs, we would like to propose the following as topics that we thought would benefit from further and more in-depth discussion during the WG's upcoming face-to-face facilitated session in Los Angeles on Friday 10 October. Please reply (off list to me is fine) with your top two choices of preferred topics - note that the last option also allows anyone to add a topic (based on the group's Preliminary Conclusions and templates to date, and following the Charter questions and agreed categories A-G) that is not specifically listed below. Staff will compile a list of the top three topics selected by the most WG members for discussion at the 10 October session. 1. What rights/responsibilities and obligations should be communicated by P/P service providers to customers/registrants with regard to transfers and renewals of domain name registrations? (from Category B Question 3 - see attached report from the Transfers Issues sub-team (James and Kathy); the WG Template including Preliminary Conclusions can be reviewed at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg) 2. Further discussion on Category E - Relay (see WG Templates including Preliminary Conclusions at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg; specifically, the three remaining "open questions", i.e.: (a) Should providers be required to forward hard copy notices to registrants/customers, on request, in cases where electronic communications are known to be undeliverable? (b) Should providers be permitted to charge a reasonable fee to forward non-electronic communications that incur a cost to do so (this could include monetary costs such as charges for registered mail and/or other resource costs such as man-hours to review/strip out personal information from a communication)? (c) If a provider chooses not to forward an allegation of illegal activity, should there be an obligation for a provider to inform a requestor when the provider does not forward its request? 3. Further discussion on Category F- Reveal (specific questions TBD depending on extent of WG discussions between now and 10 October; see draft WG Templates and current Preliminary Conclusions at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg) 4. What aspects of the current temporary P/P specification in the 2013 RAA should be retained and/or expanded for the accreditation program? What is not in the current specification but should be? (See https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-2013-09-17-en#priv...) 5. What are the business practices that a P/P provider should disclose to potential and actual customers, as part of the accreditation program? 6. Any other suggestions not already on this list? We attach also a suggested proposed agenda for the day - including proposed "ground rules" that have been found to have been extremely useful for focusing discussions - and a document on Collaborative Reminders prepared by our professional facilitators that similarly are intended to facilitate useful constructive discussion and outcomes based on the objectives of our session. On behalf of the WG chairs, we look forward to your feedback on the topics for our LA discussion. Please indicate your choices as soon as possible and in any event by this Friday 3 October. Thank you! Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>

Hello Mary, I would join in with the other members that have opposed the proposed restriction on computer/phone usage, although I would be interested to learn of the source of this suggestion. However, in attempting to keep an open mind, perhaps staff can take the following recommendation back to staff/board. I sometimes find it frustrating during the public comment period to see all the board members busily typing away at their computers, while not paying full attention to the people at the mic. So perhaps the Board could lead by example in LA, and the entire Board could leave their cell phones and computers turned off during the Thu public forum and ICANN Board meeting. If they find it to be a positive experience, then perhaps the community could try it in the future. Again just trying to approach with an open mind, and encouraging the ICANN Board to lead by example. Best regards, Michael From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:42 PM To: PPSAI WG Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Please select TWO topics from this list for the WG F2F session on 10 Oct 2014 Dear WG members, After consultation with the WG chairs, we would like to propose the following as topics that we thought would benefit from further and more in-depth discussion during the WG's upcoming face-to-face facilitated session in Los Angeles on Friday 10 October. Please reply (off list to me is fine) with your top two choices of preferred topics - note that the last option also allows anyone to add a topic (based on the group's Preliminary Conclusions and templates to date, and following the Charter questions and agreed categories A-G) that is not specifically listed below. Staff will compile a list of the top three topics selected by the most WG members for discussion at the 10 October session. 1. What rights/responsibilities and obligations should be communicated by P/P service providers to customers/registrants with regard to transfers and renewals of domain name registrations? (from Category B Question 3 - see attached report from the Transfers Issues sub-team (James and Kathy); the WG Template including Preliminary Conclusions can be reviewed at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg) 2. Further discussion on Category E - Relay (see WG Templates including Preliminary Conclusions at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg; specifically, the three remaining "open questions", i.e.: (a) Should providers be required to forward hard copy notices to registrants/customers, on request, in cases where electronic communications are known to be undeliverable? (b) Should providers be permitted to charge a reasonable fee to forward non-electronic communications that incur a cost to do so (this could include monetary costs such as charges for registered mail and/or other resource costs such as man-hours to review/strip out personal information from a communication)? (c) If a provider chooses not to forward an allegation of illegal activity, should there be an obligation for a provider to inform a requestor when the provider does not forward its request? 3. Further discussion on Category F- Reveal (specific questions TBD depending on extent of WG discussions between now and 10 October; see draft WG Templates and current Preliminary Conclusions at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg) 4. What aspects of the current temporary P/P specification in the 2013 RAA should be retained and/or expanded for the accreditation program? What is not in the current specification but should be? (See https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-2013-09-17-en#priv acy-proxy) 5. What are the business practices that a P/P provider should disclose to potential and actual customers, as part of the accreditation program? 6. Any other suggestions not already on this list? We attach also a suggested proposed agenda for the day - including proposed "ground rules" that have been found to have been extremely useful for focusing discussions - and a document on Collaborative Reminders prepared by our professional facilitators that similarly are intended to facilitate useful constructive discussion and outcomes based on the objectives of our session. On behalf of the WG chairs, we look forward to your feedback on the topics for our LA discussion. Please indicate your choices as soon as possible and in any event by this Friday 3 October. Thank you! Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@icann.org <mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>

All, My top two topics for best using our F2F time are topics 2 (Category E - Relay) and 3 (Category F - Reveal). As for the laptop/phone ban, I also object - although for slightly different reasons. More specifically, I think it will actually make us less productive. If the ban is in place, we'll need to use the break time to communicate with remote participants, at which point we may well discover that there is a need to revisit the pre-break discussion. If we're able to communicate with remote participants in real-time, such revisiting seems less likely to me. K From: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of Mary Wong Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:42 PM To: PPSAI WG Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Please select TWO topics from this list for the WG F2F session on 10 Oct 2014 Dear WG members, After consultation with the WG chairs, we would like to propose the following as topics that we thought would benefit from further and more in-depth discussion during the WG's upcoming face-to-face facilitated session in Los Angeles on Friday 10 October. Please reply (off list to me is fine) with your top two choices of preferred topics - note that the last option also allows anyone to add a topic (based on the group's Preliminary Conclusions and templates to date, and following the Charter questions and agreed categories A-G) that is not specifically listed below. Staff will compile a list of the top three topics selected by the most WG members for discussion at the 10 October session. 1. What rights/responsibilities and obligations should be communicated by P/P service providers to customers/registrants with regard to transfers and renewals of domain name registrations? (from Category B Question 3 - see attached report from the Transfers Issues sub-team (James and Kathy); the WG Template including Preliminary Conclusions can be reviewed at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg) 2. Further discussion on Category E - Relay (see WG Templates including Preliminary Conclusions at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg; specifically, the three remaining "open questions", i.e.: (a) Should providers be required to forward hard copy notices to registrants/customers, on request, in cases where electronic communications are known to be undeliverable? (b) Should providers be permitted to charge a reasonable fee to forward non-electronic communications that incur a cost to do so (this could include monetary costs such as charges for registered mail and/or other resource costs such as man-hours to review/strip out personal information from a communication)? (c) If a provider chooses not to forward an allegation of illegal activity, should there be an obligation for a provider to inform a requestor when the provider does not forward its request? 3. Further discussion on Category F- Reveal (specific questions TBD depending on extent of WG discussions between now and 10 October; see draft WG Templates and current Preliminary Conclusions at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg) 4. What aspects of the current temporary P/P specification in the 2013 RAA should be retained and/or expanded for the accreditation program? What is not in the current specification but should be? (See https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-2013-09-17-en#priv...) 5. What are the business practices that a P/P provider should disclose to potential and actual customers, as part of the accreditation program? 6. Any other suggestions not already on this list? We attach also a suggested proposed agenda for the day - including proposed "ground rules" that have been found to have been extremely useful for focusing discussions - and a document on Collaborative Reminders prepared by our professional facilitators that similarly are intended to facilitate useful constructive discussion and outcomes based on the objectives of our session. On behalf of the WG chairs, we look forward to your feedback on the topics for our LA discussion. Please indicate your choices as soon as possible and in any event by this Friday 3 October. Thank you! Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@icann.org<mailto:mary.wong@icann.org>

I vote for #2 and #3. Best regards [cid:004162714@30092014-1D0E]Osvaldo Novoa Subgerente General Antel Guatemala 1075, Nivel 22 Montevideo, 11800 Uruguay Tel. +598 2928 6400 Fax. +598 2928 6401 ________________________________ De: gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg-bounces@icann.org] En nombre de Mary Wong Enviado el: Lunes, 29 de Septiembre de 2014 15:42 Para: PPSAI WG Asunto: [Gnso-ppsai-pdp-wg] Please select TWO topics from this list for the WG F2F session on 10 Oct 2014 Dear WG members, After consultation with the WG chairs, we would like to propose the following as topics that we thought would benefit from further and more in-depth discussion during the WG's upcoming face-to-face facilitated session in Los Angeles on Friday 10 October. Please reply (off list to me is fine) with your top two choices of preferred topics - note that the last option also allows anyone to add a topic (based on the group's Preliminary Conclusions and templates to date, and following the Charter questions and agreed categories A-G) that is not specifically listed below. Staff will compile a list of the top three topics selected by the most WG members for discussion at the 10 October session. 1. What rights/responsibilities and obligations should be communicated by P/P service providers to customers/registrants with regard to transfers and renewals of domain name registrations? (from Category B Question 3 - see attached report from the Transfers Issues sub-team (James and Kathy); the WG Template including Preliminary Conclusions can be reviewed at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg) 2. Further discussion on Category E - Relay (see WG Templates including Preliminary Conclusions at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg; specifically, the three remaining "open questions", i.e.: (a) Should providers be required to forward hard copy notices to registrants/customers, on request, in cases where electronic communications are known to be undeliverable? (b) Should providers be permitted to charge a reasonable fee to forward non-electronic communications that incur a cost to do so (this could include monetary costs such as charges for registered mail and/or other resource costs such as man-hours to review/strip out personal information from a communication)? (c) If a provider chooses not to forward an allegation of illegal activity, should there be an obligation for a provider to inform a requestor when the provider does not forward its request? 3. Further discussion on Category F- Reveal (specific questions TBD depending on extent of WG discussions between now and 10 October; see draft WG Templates and current Preliminary Conclusions at https://community.icann.org/x/ihLRAg) 4. What aspects of the current temporary P/P specification in the 2013 RAA should be retained and/or expanded for the accreditation program? What is not in the current specification but should be? (See https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/approved-with-specs-2013-09-17-en#priv...) 5. What are the business practices that a P/P provider should disclose to potential and actual customers, as part of the accreditation program? 6. Any other suggestions not already on this list? We attach also a suggested proposed agenda for the day - including proposed "ground rules" that have been found to have been extremely useful for focusing discussions - and a document on Collaborative Reminders prepared by our professional facilitators that similarly are intended to facilitate useful constructive discussion and outcomes based on the objectives of our session. On behalf of the WG chairs, we look forward to your feedback on the topics for our LA discussion. Please indicate your choices as soon as possible and in any event by this Friday 3 October. Thank you! Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@icann.org ________________________________ El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad de la Información This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.