Hello all and apologies for the last-minute reach out. I wanted to give you a head's up that registrars are not happy with part of the Threshold B question response. Specifically - "Model 4 calls for no accreditation program and is inconsistent with the policy and is not fit for purpose." This is because they believe it is indeed a form of accreditation. I just wanted to note this as I'll be raising it during the meeting tomorrow when this item comes up on the agenda. I'd be happy to talk through in advance how best to address (or not). ________________________________ From: Terri Agnew via Gnso-ppsai-smallteam <gnso-ppsai-smallteam@icann.org> Sent: Monday, September 29, 2025 3:35 PM To: gnso-ppsai-smallteam@icann.org <gnso-ppsai-smallteam@icann.org> Cc: GNSO-Secs <gnso-secs@icann.org> Subject: [Gnso-ppsai-smallteam] Post Call | GNSO Council PPSAI Small Team | Monday, 29 September 2025 Dear all, Please use link below to access the attendance and the recording on the small team wiki page, 2025 Meetings tab, for the GNSO Council PPSAI Small Team call held on Monday, 29 September 2025 at 14: 00 UTC. Wiki space: https: //icann-community. atlassian. net/wiki/x/AgDNGQ ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart This Message Is From an External Sender This message came from outside your organization. ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd Dear all, Please use link below to access the attendance and the recording on the small team wiki page, 2025 Meetings tab, for the GNSO Council PPSAI Small Team call held on Monday, 29 September 2025 at 14:00 UTC. Wiki space: https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/AgDNGQ<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://icann-community.atlassian.net/wiki/x/AgDNGQ__;!!Hj18uoVe_Lnx!q3yHqKrtan7OQR5hktURupGD0CoIpLHYSNKTApMDdeQR32sZeToCDNOKQ22vwvT4mgjG60DqDCPZgQPaWvA9psJ1ibMO$> Thank you! Kind regards, Terri Policy Team Supporting the GNSO