Hello everyone, I¹ve uploaded David¹s edited document to the Sub Team wiki page: https://community.icann.org/x/zoZCAw (BTW, Val, I think Alex sent the same Google Docs link for both documents so if someone can send me the correct link for Question 1 I¹ll correct the links :) FYI ­ and as a follow up from the WG call earlier today ­ I¹m going back through the WG¹s overall Public Comment Review Tool Part 1 (recommendations #1 through #9) to pick out those comments that, while ³attached² to other recommendations/questions, are directly relevant to the work of this Sub Team. I¹ll send around an updated Sub Team Review Tool as soon as I can ­ and please note also that this may need further updating once I get through Part 2 of the WG Review Tool (which will, as noted on the WG call, cover recommendations #10 through #20 minus any that are being covered by existing Sub Teams). This DOES mean that the numbers and certain statements in the current summary documents will likely need to be updated; please let me know if you prefer that I do that for the group as well ­ though if folks are still working on either summary document it may be best if you tell me which version to use if so. Thanks and cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4889 Email: mary.wong@icann.org From: <gnso-ppsai1-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Lindsay Hamilton-Reid <Lindsay.Hamilton-Reid@fasthosts.com> Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 12:26 To: David Cake <dave@difference.com.au>, "gnso-ppsai1@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai1@icann.org> Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai1] Update to 1.3.2 question 2

Hi David

Thanks for that ­ I haven¹t had the chance to read it yet but I will J.

Regards

Lindsay

-----Original Message----- From: gnso-ppsai1-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-ppsai1-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of David Cake Sent: 04 August 2015 12:44 To: gnso-ppsai1@icann.org Subject: [Gnso-ppsai1] Update to 1.3.2 question 2

I¹ve made a few changes to 1.3.2 question 2 to incorporate my separate analysis. I think the changes will be fairly uncontroversial (and one was just a proofreading comment where a sentence had become ungrammatical in editing). But feel free to discuss any issues if you feel my changes have changed the sense of the summary. My apologies for getting this done about 48 hours later than I had intended, I had some unexpected technical issues (had to spend a few hours making my laptop remember it had my email).

Regards

David