Hello everyone, at the risk of being pesky I thought I’d change the
subject title in case you didn’t see my earlier email (below) suggesting a
possible approach to the work of this Sub Team. Please accept my apologies
if you’ve already begun your work and so don’t need this reminder!

If you should need to do a Sub Team call, especially if you are scheduling
one before the next WG meeting on Tuesday, staff would greatly appreciate
your letting us know as soon as possible since we will need to set up the
recording and (if you need one) the AC room.

Thanks again, and have a great weekend,

Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4889
Email: mary.wong@icann.org




-----Original Message-----
From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@icann.org>
Date: Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 19:37
To: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-ppsai2] testing

>Loud and clear, Stephanie - thanks, and welcome, everyone, to Sub Team 2
>(dealing with Section 1.3.3 of the WG Initial Report)!
>
>It will be much appreciated if you can move all future email discussions
>to this mailing list.
>
>Please note also that I have noticed - in going over the comments received
>again - that one comment relevant to your topic seems to have been edited
>over in my formatting of the original Word document. This is a comment
>from Web.com, which I have now added as ROW 85 on page 30. No other
>changes have been made to the original document circulated previously.
>I¹ll update the wiki page accordingly.
>
>Given the extensive nature of the comments (especially for the more
>general Question 1) and the fact that there are 7 members of this Sub
>Team, would it be a good idea for this Sub Team to divide the work such
>that 3 people (for instance) can do the first sweep through Question 1
>(perhaps taking 25-30 comments each), 2 take on Question 2 (dividing the
>comments in half), 1 person do Question 3 and the last person do the
>remaining general comments?
>
>This could be the first phase, and each person could use the same format
>to ensure consistency - whether that be the template provided or something
>like what Sub Team 1 (for Section 1.3.2) is doing, per this week¹s report.
>Following this initial phase, the Sub Team can then come together (having
>read one another¹s submissions) to agree on recommendations to be made by
>the Sub Team as a whole to the WG.
>
>If this approach makes sense, perhaps we can take volunteers for each ³sub
>part² so that there will be something to report back to the full WG with
>this coming Tuesday?
>
>
>Thanks and cheers
>Mary
>
>Mary Wong
>Senior Policy Director
>Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>Telephone: +1 603 574 4889
>Email: mary.wong@icann.org
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: <gnso-ppsai2-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Stephanie Perrin
><stephanie.perrin@mail.utoronto.ca>
>Date: Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 19:14
>To: "gnso-ppsai2@icann.org" <gnso-ppsai2@icann.org>
>Subject: [Gnso-ppsai2] testing
>
>>testing
>>SP
>>_______________________________________________
>>Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list
>>Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org
>>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2
>

_______________________________________________
Gnso-ppsai2 mailing list
Gnso-ppsai2@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-ppsai2