Dear All, 

 

Please find below the attendance and MP3 recording for the Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP SubTeam2 call held on Monday, 31 August 2015 at 16:00 UTC.

Transcript will follow upon receipt.

MP3:   https://icann.box.com/shared/static/2eyp5ftx2ltdp6l3de6c0mmio6d84c6u.mp3

 Attendees: 

Kiran Malancharuvil- IPC

Terri Stumme ­ BC

Susan Prosser RrSG

Kathy Kleiman ­ NCSG

Stephanie Perrin ­ NCSG

 

Apologies:

Lindsay Hamilton-Reid ­ RrSG

Christian Dawson – ISPCP

 

ICANN staff:

Mary Wong

Terri Agnew

  

Thank you.

Kind regards,

 

Terri Agnew

-------------------------------

 

 Adobe Connect chat transcript for Monday, 31 August 2015

 

  Terri Agnew:Welcome to the Privacy & Proxy Services Accreditation Issues PDP Sub Team 2 teleconference on Monday, 31 August 2015

  Kathy:Just lost Mary

  Terri Agnew:Welcome Stephanie Perrin

  Stephanie Perrin:Thanks, sorry I did not realize it was just the same old link

  Stephanie Perrin:I think we need it for accountability

  Kathy:I'm confused, there appear to be at least four documents

  Stephanie Perrin:I think it is more than a request....we have to follow normal procedures.

  Kathy:@Mary that sounds good

  Kathy:@Mary and All: I have no trouble putting in the commenters later...

  Stephanie Perrin:that would be wonderful..

  Stephanie Perrin:can you put up question 2 please?

  Kathy:That's not what I said at all

  Stephanie Perrin:I will have to check the transcript....I am not sure that I said we are not making progress...

  Stephanie Perrin:If so I did not mean that, nor did I mean to indicate that the call for comments was a waste of time.  It is extremely important to get input. and we got lots of it.

  Kathy:Disagree completely with what Kiran just said

  Kiran Malancharuvil:What is the justification for dismissing the comments that call for definitions? 

  Kiran Malancharuvil:Just because you don't agree?

  Kathy:It's only a small fraction of the commenters who seek to drive down the definitions path

  Susan Prosser:I agree with positioning that sub team has not made a consensus

  Kathy:+1 Susan

  Kiran Malancharuvil:The content question is a red herring.  If ICANN never took content (including commercial v. noncommercial) into account we wouldn't have any RPMs

  Kiran Malancharuvil:I would also support the "no consensus" position

  Stephanie Perrin:I will see how many folks I can line up to support my position Kiran....

  Kathy:Tx you, Mary and Terri!

  Stephanie Perrin:Thanks very much!  Slow going, but progress

  Kiran Malancharuvil:Thanks Mary! 

  Susan Prosser:Thank you Mary

  Mary Wong:thanks all!