Yes, thank you Lisa - my hope is that if we can understand the LOE before the next call then at the next call we can agree on priority ranking and move forward with it. Thank you for putting it on the agenda! *Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E* Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they swyld@tucows.com On 2024-08-13 3:23 p.m., Lisa Carter wrote:
Hi Sarah,
I see you’ve updated Item 18 priority to 2 in the Impressions Document <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XFK-RCT5Nv-KcNgX4eQunkUKgSI35Yc_nUZ6...>. I can ask the ICANN Technical team to put an LOE on this request. We will still need to get Standing Committee agreement on the priority ranking and Standing Committee consensus to move forward with the request. I can add this as an item to discuss for the next call.
Thanks
Lisa
Lisa Carter
Sr. Program Manager, Strategic Initiatives
ICANN
signature_2709461835
*From: *Sarah Wyld via Gnso-rdrs-sc <gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> *Organization: *Tucows *Reply-To: *Sarah Wyld <swyld@tucows.com> *Date: *Tuesday, August 13, 2024 at 9:13 AM *To: *"gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org" <gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> *Subject: *[Gnso-rdrs-sc] increase priority on request 18?
Hello team,
I have heard from some Rr colleagues that a request we recently added to the Impressions Doc is actually much more important than I had realized.
/Request 18: when I complete a case (regardless of outcome), rather than saving and leaving me on that request screen, please send me back to the list of requests/
Can the level of effort be evaluated so that we can prioritize this request? If it's low effort maybe the ICANN team can get started asap?
Thank you,
--
*Sarah Wyld, CIPP/E*
Policy & Privacy Manager Pronouns: she/they
swyld@tucows.com
