Thank you Lisa,

I didn't know there was going to be a survey. I recently joined this group, did we have the opportunity to weigh in on the questions? Did we map the purpose of each question to the feedback purpose?

What we have here is a "feedback" mechanism and not a "survey". The purpose of receiving feedback has to be crystal clear.

Only 1.97% of requestors answered the questions. This is not statistically significant at all to actually infer some kind of conclusion (I don't know what we want to do with this)

P.5: "some data requested" "No data requested" "All data requested" this is very confusing. I had to read it a few times. What is meant here is "I received some of the data that I requested or all of it etc". But labeling as some data requested etc is confusing. Maybe we can just label it as: Some data received, No data received all data received (I understand that the purpose of RDRS is just the triage of the requests and it doesnt render data so my suggestion might not be good either)

Q3: "Did the RDRS make it worse, better, or about the same to request nonpublic registration data, compared to doing so without the RDRS?" What are the metrics for defining "better" "same" etc? Do you mean was it easier than asking the registrar directly? Did it take less time to fill in the form? find the form? Were they more responsive? This is a vague question

Q7: good that the feedback for this cycle is so poorly answered otherwise with over 40% of people saying they are extremely unlikely or unlikely to use this system one would think we are wasting our time here and they might not even need it! (you see what I did there? this is why the purpose of the feedback has to be crystal clear)

I found the registrars' answers interesting. However, I don't know if reporting on feedback in this pilot and early stage of the process is 1) good for the success of the pilot 2) is useful. open to a conversation about this if we can have one. If we can't, then I just continue reading the reports!

Farzaneh

On Tue, May 21, 2024 at 1:51 PM Lisa Carter via Gnso-rdrs-sc <gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org> wrote:

Hi All,

The first RDRS Quarterly Survey Report for the reporting period 28 November 2023 – 31 March 2024 has been published to the RDRS page.

Thanks

Lisa Carter
Sr. Program Manager, Strategic Initiatives
ICANN

From: Lisa Carter <lisa.carter@icann.org>
Date: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 at 6:59 AM
To: "gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org" <gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org>
Subject: Re: The April RDRS Usage Metrics report is published.

Hi All,

The RDRS Usage Metrics Report and CSV for the 1-30 April reporting period have been published to the RDRS page.

Thanks

Lisa Carter
Sr. Program Manager, Strategic Initiatives
ICANN

_______________________________________________
Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.