Hi Sebastien, thanks for drafting this! 

I'm good with the overall sentiment, but I'm not sure that we would all agree to this paragraph:

> Through these exchanges during ICANN79 & 80, it has become clearly apparent to us that the Requestor and Respondent Communities need more permanent fora to share and discuss their respective needs and the others’ capacity to respond to them, to potentially find a middle ground in a set of best practices or policy.

I think there are already permanent fora to develop policy, we've been through a whole PDP WG on specifically that topic which led us to this Standing Committee. We should remove "or policy" from that paragraph.

Thank you,

Dear Standing Committee,

 

As discussed on our call last week, please find attached my proposed letter to Greg and Council suggesting/inviting Council or the Requestor+Responder communities directly, to further the more political questions of what constitute requests; allowing to focus on our Pilot Monitoring mandate.

 

Please review and comment. Absent any changes I will send it following our call Monday.

 

Kindly,

 

 

Sebastien Ducos

GoDaddy Registry | Senior Client Services Manager

+33612284445

France & Australia

sebastien@registry.godaddy

 

_______________________________________________
Gnso-rdrs-sc mailing list -- gnso-rdrs-sc@icann.org
To unsubscribe send an email to gnso-rdrs-sc-leave@icann.org

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.