- Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt - lists.icann.org

REMINDER URGENT: doodle poll /RDS PBS Statement
by Terri Agnew July 28, 2016

July 28, 2016

Dear all, Please complete the doodle poll to schedule the GNSO RDS PBS Statement call to be held either Friday, 29 July or Monday, 01 August 2016. http://doodle.com/poll/bsq9dfm42cqdsvvp I have enabled the time zone so that it can be changed to your zone. Kind regards, With kind regards, Terri Agnew --- Terri Agnew Secretariat Services Coordinator, GNSO & At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: terri.agnew(a)icann.org<mailto:terri.agnew@icann.org> Skype ID: terri.agnew.icann

1 0

Re: [Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt] Problem Statement for consideration...
by James Gannon July 28, 2016

July 28, 2016

Hi Alex, Unfortunately due to come circumstances I have actually just left the PDP working group last night so won’t be in a position to keep any movement on this, I hope that everyone involved can keep working on this and I hope to rejoin potentially in Phase 2! Apologies for having to drop it mid work stream! -James From: <gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt-bounces(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt-bounces@icann.org>> on behalf of "Deacon, Alex" <Alex_Deacon(a)mpaa.org<mailto:Alex_Deacon@mpaa.org>> Date: Wednesday 27 July 2016 at 09:43 To: "gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt@icann.org>" <gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt(a)icann.org<mailto:gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt@icann.org>> Subject: Re: [Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt] Problem Statement for consideration... Hi James, All, So how do we move forward with coming to agreement on our problem statement before next week (as requested on the last RDS call). Does it make sense to set up a call? Thanks! Alex On Jul 25, 2016, at 6:12 PM, Deacon, Alex <Alex_Deacon(a)mpaa.org<mailto:Alex_Deacon@mpaa.org>> wrote: Hi All, I took a shot at drafting a problem statement using the ether pad tool. If you look at the ether pad timeline you will see I decided to simplify/shorten what I originally wrote. I’ve copied the text I ended up with below for convenience. Looking forward to hearing your thoughts…. Alex Draft Problem Statement (a.k.a. What problem are we trying to solve.) WHOIS has been the source of almost two decades of study, discussion and debate within the ICANN community and beyond. The Next Generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) PDP Working Group has been tasked to define the policies associated a new and improved RDS that will meet the needs of the existing and ever evolving global Internet. The core problem that will need to be solved in defining this policy is addressing the tension among the varied and competing views of ICANN constituencies on key issues related to the right to privacy, anonymity, intellectual property protection, security and abuse, among others. [2] At a high level this means understanding the purpose of domain name registration data [3] in addition to ensuring a system to support domain name registration and maintenance which: * Provides appropriate access to accurate, reliable, and uniform registration data; * Protects the privacy of Registrant information; * Enables a reliable mechanism for identifying, establishing and maintaining the ability to contact Registrants; * Supports a framework to address issues involving Registrants, including but not limited to: consumer protection, investigation of cybercrime, and intellectual property protection; and * Provides an infrastructure to address appropriate law enforcement needs. [4] References [1] "...the current [WHOIS] system is broken and needs to be repaired." - WHOIS Policy Review Teams Final Report, May 2012 [2] "A gross understatement is that tensions exist between the various ICANN constituencies regarding WHOIS. Issues abound including right to privacy, anonymity, intellectual property protection, security and abuse, among others. Each is important. None more so than the other." - WHOIS Policy Review Teams Final Report, May 2012 [3] "The SSAC believes that the foundational problem facing all “WHOIS” discussions is understanding the purpose of domain name registration data." - SAC055 WHOIS: Blind Men And An Elephant [4] “...the EWG developed a high-level statement of purpose, using it to align this report’s recommendations with ICANN’s mission and design a system to support domain name registration and maintenance which: *  Provides appropriate access to accurate, reliable, and uniform registration data; *  Protects the privacy of Registrant information; *  Enables a reliable mechanism for identifying, establishing and maintaining the ability to contact Registrants; *  Supports a framework to address issues involving Registrants, including but not limited to: consumer protection, investigation of cybercrime, and intellectual property protection; and *  Provides an infrastructure to address appropriate law enforcement needs." - Final Report from the EWG on gTLD Directory Services, June 2014

6 9

doodle poll /RDS PBS Statement
by Terri Agnew July 27, 2016

July 27, 2016

Dear all, Please complete the doodle poll to schedule the GNSO RDS PBS Statement call to be held either Friday, 29 July or Monday, 01 August 2016. http://doodle.com/poll/bsq9dfm42cqdsvvp I have enabled the time zone so that it can be changed to your zone. Kind regards, With kind regards, Terri Agnew --- Terri Agnew Secretariat Services Coordinator, GNSO & At-Large Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Email: terri.agnew(a)icann.org<mailto:terri.agnew@icann.org> Skype ID: terri.agnew.icann

1 0

Current draft
by James Gannon July 27, 2016

July 27, 2016

Hi all, I have received some offline feedback on the current statement, many feel its good and I received the following feedback The first paragraph seems fine to me but the next two paragraph seem to get into deliberation. I don’t personally disagree with the statements made but it seems to me that assumptions about future WG decisions on requirements should be avoided. For example: “An important aspect of safety on the Internet has been a reasonable assumption of privacy.” The third paragraph also seems to assume requirements that we have not yet agreed on. It may be that the 2nd & 3rd paragraphs could be worded more as problem statements instead of assumptions of fact. Can someone who has been holding the pen actively try and work this feedback into the current statement? -James

5 5

Re: [Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt] Problem Statement
by DANIEL NANGHAKA July 8, 2016

July 8, 2016

Dear All, Please find the attached the draft problem statement. I would also like to recommend probably we create a google doc for easy review and comments. Thanks Regards Nanghaka Daniel K. Executive Director - ILICIT Africa / Council Member - FOSSFA / Community Lead - ISOC Uganda Chapter Mobile +256 772 898298 (Uganda) Skype: daniel.nanghaka ----------------------------------------- *"Working for Africa" * ----------------------------------------- ᐧ

8 16

Face to face time today (Thursday 2016-06-30)
by Shane Kerr June 30, 2016

June 30, 2016

Hello, Due to generally being crap, I had some problems setting up a poll to find a time for people in Helsinki to meet to talk about the RDS problem statement. Sorry. :( There is almost no time left, but if anyone wants to discuss it in person perhaps we can meet in the Helsinki Hall Foyer at 11:00 or so? I'll be working from one of the round tables there this morning. Attached please find a photo of me face palming myself there for my own stupidity. Cheers, -- Shane

8 9

Ref: Timeline for the Development of the Problem Statement
by DANIEL NANGHAKA June 29, 2016

June 29, 2016

Good morning members, I would like to inquire the timeline that we have to develop the Problem Statement? Or is there a specific deadline. Regards Nanghaka Daniel K. Executive Director - ILICIT Africa / Council Member - FOSSFA / Community Lead - ISOC Uganda Chapter Mobile +256 772 898298 (Uganda) Skype: daniel.nanghaka ----------------------------------------- *"Working for Africa" * ----------------------------------------- ᐧ

1 0