I’ve added comments and edits.

From: gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt-bounces@icann.org [mailto:gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt-bounces@icann.org] On Behalf Of DANIEL NANGHAKA
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:02 AM
To: Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
Cc: gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt@icann.org
Subject: Re: [Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt] Etherpad for work (was: Problem Statement)

Thanks Shane for putting it up. 

ᐧ

Regards
Nanghaka Daniel K.
Executive Director - ILICIT Africa / Council Member - FOSSFA / Community Lead - ISOC Uganda Chapter
Mobile +256 772 898298 (Uganda)

Skype: daniel.nanghaka

----------------------------------------- "Working for Africa" -----------------------------------------

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org> wrote:

Daniel,

I've put up an Etherpad here:

https://etherpad.wikimedia.org/p/gnso-rds-pbstatement-0

I did a quick search to see if there was an ICANN Etherpad and didn't
find one. If there is a better spot we can move there.

I also made a note that since RDAP seems to be included as a sort of
mandate that we should document that too, although I have no proposed
text since I'm a bit uncertain if this is true or if it is to what
extent. ;)

Cheers,

--
Shane

At 2016-06-30 10:20:54 +0300
DANIEL NANGHAKA <dndannang@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Shane,
>
> Then I suggest we could use possible alternatives like the Etherpad
> http://etherpad.org since China does not like google.
>
>
> ᐧ
>
>
> Regards
> Nanghaka Daniel K.
> Executive Director - ILICIT Africa / Council Member - FOSSFA / Community
> Lead - ISOC Uganda Chapter
> Mobile +256 772 898298 (Uganda)
> Skype: daniel.nanghaka
>
> ----------------------------------------- *"Working for Africa" *
> -----------------------------------------
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Shane Kerr <shane@time-travellers.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Daniel,
> >
> > Thank you very much for kicking this off!
> >
> > At 2016-06-30 09:19:38 +0300
> > DANIEL NANGHAKA <dndannang@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Please find the attached the draft problem statement.
> >
> > I think we need to have a few sentences documenting the constraints
> > of the RDS WG:
> >
> >     The RDS WG will not consider the questions of:
> >
> >     1. Whether publishing WHOIS-style data is necessary
> >     2. What data registries will collect
> >     3. How registry data is managed
> >
> > I do not like these constraints, but if they are there then it I think
> > that it is important to document them so it is clear that these are
> > off-charter.
> >
> > It would also be good to document where such limitations came from, but
> > I don't know that.
> >
> > If these are NOT limits, then I think the problem statement should
> > include these questions as high-priority topics to be addressed before
> > anything else.
> >
> > > I would also like to recommend probably we create a google doc for easy
> > > review and comments.
> >
> > I don't really mind using a Google document for this, but it might be
> > nice to try to find an alternate way to jointly edit stuff. (My reason
> > is that China hates Google. When I am working out of my company's
> > offices in Beijing it is a pain in the ass to use any Google cloud
> > stuff.)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > --
> > Shane
> >