Hi Alex,
I like the idea of a call - and I'm available next Monday.
Thanks for drafting your proposed problem statement. I'll take a
look and let you have my thoughts asap. But I'm sure it's perfect
as is. :-)
Marina
Marina A. Lewis
(415) 290-1245
marina@dns-law.com
On Jul 27, 2016, at 2:08 PM, Deacon, Alex
<Alex_Deacon@mpaa.org>
wrote:
Hi James,
I’m sorry to hear you will be leaving the WG.
Problem-Statement team,
I think in order to move things forward we should take Lisa up on her
offer to set up a doodle pool and try and set up a call late this week or
on Monday of next week.
Thoughts?
Also, I’ve not heard any feedback on my proposed purpose statement -
should I assume everyone thinks its perfect and we are done?
:)
FWIW it does cover the concerns raised in the original version (privacy)
on the Etherpad, but also touches upon other important issues that we
must come to agreement on.
Thanks
Alex
On Jul 27, 2016, at 11:34 AM,
James Gannon
<james@cyberinvasion.net
> wrote:
Hi Alex,
Unfortunately due to come circumstances I have actually just left the PDP
working group last night so won’t be in a position to keep any movement
on this, I hope that everyone involved can keep working on this and I
hope to rejoin potentially in Phase 2!
Apologies for having to drop it mid work stream!
-James
From:
<
gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of
"Deacon, Alex"
<Alex_Deacon@mpaa.org>
Date: Wednesday 27 July 2016 at 09:43
To:
"
gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt@icann.org"
<
gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt@icann.org>
Subject: Re: [Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt] Problem Statement for
consideration...
Hi James, All,
So how do we move forward with coming to agreement on our problem
statement before next week (as requested on the last RDS call).
Does it make sense to set up a call?
Thanks!
Alex
On Jul 25, 2016, at 6:12 PM,
Deacon, Alex
<Alex_Deacon@mpaa.org>
wrote:
Hi All,
I took a shot at drafting a problem statement using the ether pad
tool. If you look at the ether pad timeline you will see I
decided to simplify/shorten what I originally wrote. I’ve
copied the text I ended up with below for convenience.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts..
Alex
Draft Problem Statement (a.k.a. What problem are we trying to
solve.)
WHOIS has been the source of almost two decades of study, discussion
and debate within the ICANN community and beyond. The Next
Generation Registration Directory Service (RDS) PDP Working Group has
been tasked to define the policies associated a new and improved RDS that
will meet the needs of the existing and ever evolving global
Internet.
The core problem that will need to be solved in defining this policy is
addressing the tension among the varied and competing views of ICANN
constituencies on key issues related to the right to privacy, anonymity,
intellectual property protection, security and abuse, among others.
[2] At a high level this means understanding the purpose of domain
name registration data [3] in addition to ensuring a system to support
domain name registration and maintenance which:
- Provides appropriate access to accurate, reliable, and uniform
registration data;
- Protects the privacy of Registrant information;
- Enables a reliable mechanism for identifying, establishing and
maintaining the ability to contact Registrants;
- Supports a framework to address issues involving Registrants,
including but not limited to: consumer protection, investigation of
cybercrime, and intellectual property protection; and
- Provides an infrastructure to address appropriate law enforcement
needs. [4]
References
[1] "...the current [WHOIS] system is broken and needs to be
repaired."
- WHOIS Policy Review Teams Final Report, May
2012
[2] "A gross understatement is that tensions exist between the
various ICANN constituencies regarding WHOIS. Issues abound including
right to privacy, anonymity, intellectual property protection, security
and abuse, among others. Each is important. None more so than the
other."
- WHOIS Policy Review Teams Final Report, May
2012
[3] "The SSAC believes that the foundational problem facing all
“WHOIS” discussions is understanding the purpose of domain name
registration data."
- SAC055 WHOIS: Blind Men And An Elephant
[4] “...the EWG developed a high-level statement of purpose, using it
to align this report’s recommendations with ICANN’s mission and
design a system to support domain name registration and maintenance
which:
- Provides appropriate access to accurate, reliable, and uniform
registration data;
- Protects the privacy of Registrant information;
- Enables a reliable mechanism for identifying, establishing and
maintaining the ability to contact Registrants;
- Supports a framework to address issues involving Registrants,
including but not limited to: consumer protection, investigation of
cybercrime, and intellectual property protection; and
- Provides an infrastructure to address appropriate law enforcement
needs."
- Final Report from the EWG on gTLD
Directory Services, June 2014
_______________________________________________
Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt mailing list
Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt
_______________________________________________
Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt mailing list
Gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt@icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-rds-pbstatement-dt