Daniel,

Thank you very much for kicking this off!

At 2016-06-30 09:19:38 +0300
DANIEL NANGHAKA <dndannang@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please find the attached the draft problem statement.

I think we need to have a few sentences documenting the constraints
of the RDS WG:

    The RDS WG will not consider the questions of:

    1. Whether publishing WHOIS-style data is necessary
    2. What data registries will collect
    3. How registry data is managed

I do not like these constraints, but if they are there then it I think
that it is important to document them so it is clear that these are
off-charter.

It would also be good to document where such limitations came from, but
I don't know that.

If these are NOT limits, then I think the problem statement should
include these questions as high-priority topics to be addressed before
anything else.

> I would also like to recommend probably we create a google doc for easy
> review and comments.

I don't really mind using a Google document for this, but it might be
nice to try to find an alternate way to jointly edit stuff. (My reason
is that China hates Google. When I am working out of my company's
offices in Beijing it is a pain in the ass to use any Google cloud
stuff.)

Cheers,

--
Shane